Free Shipping on all U.S. orders over $95!

Have questions? Give us a call today: (888)366-0345 or Contact Us

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Aleister Crowley has to be one of the most interesting humans of the 20th century. His resume includes being a ceremonial magician, poet, novelist, mountaineer, painter, a rumored spy for British Intelligence, and an occultist. He is also a terrible human being with a flagrant disregard for his fellow man and a running streak of debauchery, indulgence, wickedness, and cruelty. His wickedness earned him the name of "The Beast," which both in name and tobacco preferences served as the inspiration behind Cornell & Diehl's Small Batch The Beast, which is based on his rumored personal blend of straight Perique soaked in rum, with C&D's take adding some much-needed complexity and nuance. Today, we're going to take a condensed look at Crowley's eccentric life and see the man behind The Beast.

Crowley's Early Life

Edward Alexander "Aleister" Crowley was born on October 12, 1875, in Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, which led to the remark later in his Confessions: "It has been remarked a strange coincidence that one small county should have given England her two greatest poets — for one must not forget Shakespeare."

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Aleister Crowley during Boleskine House era (1899-1915)

His father Edward Crowley was an engineer, though he never practiced his profession, and had shares in his family's lucrative brewing business, Crowley's Alton Ales, which allowed him to retire early and live a life of leisure. His mother Emily Bertha Bishop came from the Devonshire-Somerset family. The couple were evangelical Christians, with his father being born a Quaker before converting to Plymouth Brethren, a faction of extreme Christian fundamentalists known for their belief in the literal truth of the Bible and a sordid view of life. Upon marriage, Emily also converted. The Crowleys began each day by reading aloud a chapter from the Bible, with Aleister's parents incorporating their eager anticipation of the Day of Judgement when everyone but members of the Plymouth Brethren would be purged in hellfire.

Crowley's father was very devout, spending his retirement as a traveling preacher, and he worked as a writer producing pamphlets on the resurrection, "end times," and other topics common to the Plymouth Brethren cause. A young Crowley fully accepted his parents' creed and couldn't imagine why others would be so wicked as to reject their teachings. This led to Crowley believing his father was a hero and a friend, speaking of him as being a "magnificently eloquent" preacher. While Crowley respected and admired his father, his relationship with his mother was more complicated.

For a large part of Crowley's childhood, the Bible was the only book available to him, and he developed a strange fascination with the Book of Revelations, feeling drawn to the Dragon, the False Prophet, the Beast, and the Scarlet Woman; characters that would help inform his philosophy of life in his later years. Revelations also served as the starting point of his self-described masochism, to which he would later admit he had "the fantasy of desiring to be hurt."

Emily was very strict with little sense of humor. While Crowley largely resented her, he was a dutiful son throughout his life. At the ripe age of eight, Crowley was sent to H. T. Habershon's evangelical Christian boarding school in Hastings for a short period. Before being sent to Ebor preparatory in Cambridge, the Reverend Henry d'Arcy Champney, who ran the school, considered Crowley a sadist. On March 5, 1887, his father died of tongue cancer; this would serve as one of the first of what Crowley would call instances of his psychic intuition but also a turning point in the boy's life. "On the night of March 5th, the boy — away at school — dreamed that his father was dead."

It should be noted that Edward's condition was, in some form, treatable at the time but Edward and his fellow Brethren deemed his condition to be God's will and that he should not receive the treatment Sir James Paget, who served as Edward's doctor, advised the man to take. Some historians believe witnessing his father reject potentially life-saving procedures helped to fuel the young Crowley's separation from Christianity.

Until his father's funeral, Crowley, by most accounts, was a normal child but something changed, and something began to turn inside him at the funeral. When Crowley returned to school, he misbehaved. The incident was mostly waved off because of the loss of his father, but Crowley knew he had passed a boundary. The incident was as Crowley would describe, "the first symptom of a complete reversal of his attitude to life."

Crowley's change in attitude didn't mean he rejected the beliefs he grew up with. In his words, he switched sides. Throughout his life, Crowley would invoke Lucifer in certain practices and writing, but he also invoked pretty much everything from ancient Egyptian deities to practicing Buddhism, and even, in some very strange ways, Christianity. That said, Crowley also says both "I simply went over to Satan's side; and to this hour I cannot tell why," and "I was anxious to distinguish myself by committing sin." The best way I can describe Crowley when it comes to the topic of "was he a Satanist or *insert other religion*" is that worshiping something, whether it be God, Satan, or a toaster, implies a certain level of reverence; the only thing Crowley ever felt this toward truly and wholly was himself. Crowley was less focused on the identities of the entities he invoked and more focused on the "Magick" he was practicing.

During this turbulent time in Crowley's life, he became skeptical of Christianity, pointing out his perceived inconsistencies in the Bible to his teachers, and he went against his father's taught morality by smoking and participating in general sexual debauchery. At some point in Crowley's descent into sin, his mother was so scandalized by his behavior that she called him "the Beast 666," a name that he reveled in. After a couple of failed schooling attempts, he was eventually sent to live with a Brethren tutor in Eastbourne, where he would take chemistry courses at Eastbourne College. During his college years, he also developed interests in chess, poetry, and mountain climbing.

Mountain climbing would be particularly important throughout Crowley's life, leading to several expeditions to some of the world's hardest mountain ranges. In 1894, he climbed Beachy Head in East Sussex, England, before journeying to the Alps and joining the Scottish Mountaineering Club. In 1895, he returned to the Bernese Alps, climbing five of its highest peaks.

After his Bernese expedition, he returned home and began attending Cambridge University. At some point, he adopted the name of Aleister over Edward. He originally entered Cambridge for the Moral Science Tripos studying philosophy, but with his tutor's approval, he switched to English Literature, which was not really in the roster of curriculum offered. In true bohemian fashion, Crowley most engaged in his personal pastimes instead of studying. He was president of the chess club, playing for two hours a day at minimum, but Crowley also embraced his passion for the written word. He was fascinated by the works of Percy Shelley and Captain Sir Richard Burton. Crowley developed a passion for writing poetry, appearing in multiple publications like Cambridge Magazine and The Granta.

These interests didn't take away from his time in the mountains. He would holiday to the Alps for climbs every year from 1894 to 1898. Crowley would sometimes be joined by mountaineer Oscar Eckenstein, who started several modern trends in climbing like using shorter ice axes and designing the modern crampon. In 1897, Crowley would make his first ascent of Mönch without a guide. During his 1896 holiday in Stockholm, Crowley had his first self-described mystical experience with his first gay relationship, leading him to recognize and embrace his bisexuality. Crowley was already a serial womanizer but would expand his sphere to include men despite homosexual relationships being illegal at the time.

Despite his pursuit of science and extracurriculars, Eastbourne didn't prove to be the escape the young Crowley hoped for. He soon found himself in a dispute between the Plymouth Brethren family he was staying with and one of their daughters. The daughter was engaged to a young man who was not part of the Brethren. The family demanded he convert or they wouldn't approve of the marriage, but when the young man rejected the idea, there was a big uproar, and the family began to abuse the daughter. At some point in this familial dispute, Crowley voiced his opinion and the abuse shifted to him. Crowley pushed back and eventually left but not before pleading with the daughter to leave her home and go to her fiancé. Despite Crowley's disregard for the status quo, he found her family's destruction of her true love insufferable, a theme that would carry into his poetry but not his actual relationships.

This was the last straw for Crowley's family, and they decided that the best they could do was to let him walk his own path. Crowley would travel around for a while and during a trip to Saint Petersburg, Russia, he was unsure of his role in life. He considered becoming a diplomat or a chess master but grew disillusioned with both. The young Crowley became depressed with no idea what to do with his life. This mental state developed into a nihilistic attitude that stayed with Crowley till death. However, it inspired a rather strange desire to rebel against it at the same time. Crowley would describe it as "I must find a material in which to work which is resistant to the forces of change."

This rebellion marked the point where Crowley would dedicate his life to pursuing the occult.

Aleister Crowley and the Occult

Crowley's occult career truly began with two books in the spring of 1898: A. E. Waite's The Book Of Black Magic and of Pacts (also known as The Book of Ceremonial Magic), and Karl von Eckartshausen's The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary. The Book of Black Magic was Waite's attempt to document multiple grimoires, explain their history, and discuss the theology behind them while synthesizing many of the grimoires into one system. The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary was Eckartshausen's view on Christian mysticism. Eckarshausen was a very unusual mystic of his time; He was a devout Catholic and theosophist in the way of Jacob Boehme, the German Philosopher and Christian mystic. The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary covered his belief in the "interior Church," the mystical body of true believers that is linked by spiritual experience rather than by doctrine. It was Eckartshausen's unique take on the method of regeneration in Christ.

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Of the two, Crowley greatly disliked Waite's work and would vilify him at every opportunity, with Crowley calling Waite "not only the most ponderously platitudinous and priggishly prosaic of pretentiously pompous pork butchers of the language, but the most voluminously voluble." However, Waite's work suggests the existence of a Hidden Church, and this intrigued the young Crowley. Crowley would write to Waite, who suggested that he read the The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary. This began his obsession with getting into this church with his opportunity coming in the summer of 1898. Crowley was on holiday in the Alps, with unfortunately bad weather that made climbing impossible. With climbing out of the picture, Crowley left the camp for Zermatt where he went to a beer hall and pondered the mysteries of alchemy, a subject he was greatly underqualified to discuss. An English chemist named Julian Baker was in attendance that night and spoke to Crowley after, explaining that he was a practicing alchemist and that he had prepared "fixed mercury," which was quite the achievement for an alchemist.

The young occultist determined that Baker would be his ticket into the Hidden Church and decided to speak to him again the next morning. By the morning, Baker had vamoosed, and Crowley would telegraph all over the valley for word on his movements. Eventually, he caught up with the alchemist on the road toward Brique and told him of his search for the Hidden Church. Baker told him of a group in London who Crowley should get in touch with, as well as someone in London who was more of a magician than the alchemist. Upon returning to London, Baker would introduce Crowley to George Cecil Jones, Baker's in-law and fellow member of the order. The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn was a secret society devoted to the study and practice of occult Hermeticism and metaphysics and was widely influential in many modern-day concepts of ritual and magic. They were one of the single largest influences on 20th-century Western occultism.

A few short months later in November, Crowley would be initiated into the Outer Order of the Golden Dawn by their leader Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers. During this ceremony, Crowley took the magical motto and name "Frater Perdurabo" which he interpreted as "Brother I shall endure to the end."

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Crowley moved into a luxury flat on Chancery Lane and would invite senior Golden Dawn member, Allan Bennett, who later became a prominent English Buddhist of the Theravāda tradition and would be a major driving influence in Buddhism's introduction to England, to serve as his personal magical tutor. Bennett taught Crowley mostly ceremonial magic and the use of drugs and narcotics to reach higher consciousness and would lead to Crowley's many drug dependencies over the years. This is where Crowley's infamous personal blend of 100% straight Perique soaked in rum came into play. Crowley believed that higher concentrations of nicotine could help elevate him to higher levels of consciousness. Eventually, Bennett would leave Crowley to journey to Asia in pursuit of continuing his own studies.

Crowley quickly rose up the ranks of the Golden Dawn and was about to be welcomed into the group's Second Order. However, he was unpopular with many members due to his open bisexuality and vocal libertine lifestyle. To round out his reputation, he developed several feuds with prominent group members like the famed Irish writer William Butler Yeats, one of the driving forces behind the Irish Literary Revival, and one of the founders of the Abbey Theatre. The group would deny his initiation into the Second Order; however, he visited Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers in Paris, who personally let him into the Adeptus Minor Grade.

This affiliation led to a schism within the Gold Dawn, who opposed Mathers' autocratic rule within the order. Crowley and his mistress Elaine Simpson were ordered by Mathers to seize the Vault of the Adepts, a temple within the Dawn, from the London lodge members. The case would be taken before the courts, and a judge would rule in favor of the London lodge as they had paid the rent. This decision left Crowley, Simpson, and Mathers removed from the group. Mathers and Crowley would stay in touch but slowly turn against each other, slinging curses and paranoid conspiracies against one another. Eventually, Mathers would sue Crowley for revealing Golden Dawn secrets in some of his publications.

Throughout Crowley's life, he would perform countless rituals and religious customs to practice magick, as he stylized it. His most famous examples were the practice of sex magic, where the use of sex and narcotics could invoke deities or states of mind.

Crowley and Thelema

Crowley kept an eccentric crowd around him. In 1902, he arrived in Paris and joined his friend and famed painter Gerald Kelly. Through Kelly, Crowley would become an active member of the Parisian arts scene, with Crowley penning a number of poems including a series based on sculptor Auguste Rodin's work. The series was called Rodin in Rime. W. Somerset Maugham briefly met Crowley and used him as a model for the character Oliver Haddo in the novel The Magician. In April 1903, Crowley returned to Boleskin, and in August, he wed Kelly's sister Rose Edith Kelly so she could prevent entering an arranged marriage.

The marriage was not received well by the Kelly family nor with Gerald, greatly damaging their friendship. Directly after finishing the ceremony and becoming husband and wife, her brother Gerald then barged into the room and attempted to punch Crowley. The marriage was supposed to be non-existent, simply a union to avoid the arrangement but during their honeymoon, Crowley fell in love with Rose and penned her love poems, which he published as Rose Mundi and Other Love Songs.

In February 1904, Crowley and the now-pregnant Rose arrived in Cairo, Egypt. The duo decided that the best course of action was to pretend they were Prince and Princess and rent an apartment. Crowley set up a temple room and began invoking ancient Egyptian deities while also studying Islamic mysticism and Arabic. According to the very reliable source of Crowley himself, the following happened: Rose regularly became delirious and informed him "they are waiting for you." On March 18, 1904, she explained that "they" was the god Horus, and two days later proclaimed the "Equinox of the Gods has come." From here, she led him to a museum where she showed him the Stele of Ankh-ef-en-Knhnosu, which Crowley would later dub "Stele of Revealing." Crowley also noted that the exhibit's number was 666, the Number of the Beast in Christian theology.

Weeks later, on April 8, Crowley heard a voice identifying itself as Aiwass, the messenger of Horus. For the next three days, Crowley wrote down everything the voice told him and titled the work The Book of the Law. This book, and the philosophy behind it, became the founding book of Crowley's religion, Thelema.

The actual philosophy behind Thelema was that a supreme moral law would be introduced within the eon, and "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of Law," and that members should live in tune with their own will. Crowley's religion wasn't something he really went around preaching early on. He claims he was "unsure" of what to do with the book. He somewhat resented it and ignored the text's desires for him to steal the Stele of Revealing, building a fortified island with followers, and translating the book into every known language. In Crowley's recollection, he typed up some manuscripts of the work to several class occultists he knew and put the Book of Law away and ignored it.

Years later, in November 1907, Crowley said he was once again contacted by Aiwass who instructed him to write more texts to add to the The Book of Law: Liber VII and Liber Cordis Cincti Serpente, both of which would be added to the Holy Books of Thelema. During the next two months, he would also write seven more texts he claimed from various supernatural sources. Around this same time, Crowley and Jones decided to found an occult order known as A∴A∴. The organization was located at 124 Victoria Street in London, and "borrowed" largely the rites from the Golden Dawn, but with Thelemic influences.

Crowley was sued by his former master Mathers in January 1920 for publishing Golden Dawn secrets in the A∴A∴ publication, The Equinox. The court ruled in favor of Crowley, and the case was widely reported in the press. Crowley enjoyed the spotlight and played up the Satanist stereotype, as well as advocating for human sacrifice despite believing in neither.

The publicity also helped A∴A∴ grow in numbers, and soon Crowley developed the Rites of Artemis, a public performance of magic featuring the group's members personifying various gods and entities. The first public performance of it included giving the audience a fruit punch laced with psychoactive peyote to"'enhance" their experience. Reviewers rated it positively. In the fall of 1910, Crowley would attempt a similar act with the Rites of Eleusis at Caxton Hall in Westminster to much more mixed reviews.

Crowley would publish various occult publications and serve as the producer for The Ragged Ragtime Girls, a touring group of female violinists from 1912 to 1914. January 1914 was particularly noteworthy as Victor Neuburg and Crowley settled into an apartment where the two would spend six weeks performing "Paris Working," which involved heavy drug use to invoke the gods of Mercury and Jupiter and a lot of debaucherous acts. Following the six weeks, Neuburg would begin to distance himself from Crowley.

1914 also marked Crowley's economic downturn. His inheritance had run out and he was living off donations from A∴A∴ and due payments from another organization. He moved to New York City and lived out of a hotel. Crowley's religion would never truly thrive but be enough to pay his bills to some extent for the remainder of his days. When the Nazis were rising to power in Germany, and through the influence of his friend Martha Küntzel, Crowley briefly believed that Hitler might convert to Thelema, but when the Nazis abolished the German Ordo Templi Orientis and tried to imprison Karl Germer, Crowley ditched the idea.

Crowley: Traitor or Secret Service?

During the economic downturn of Crowley's life, he had gigs as a writer for Vanity Fair and undertook freelance work for Evangeline Adams. The Great War had just begun and Crowley began to support Germany in their war against Britain. In January 1915, pro-German propagandist George Sylvester Viereck employed Crowley as a writer for the propagandist paper, The Fatherland. Crowley in later years was branded a traitor to Britain for this activity.

Despite this turn of events, biographers Richard B. Spence and Tobias Churton have suggested that Crowley was actually involved in British secret services. They suggest that Crowley joined the Golden Dawn to monitor Mathers, who was a known Carlist. They also suggest that the coup attempt was to undermine Mather's. Other ideas they've suggested were that a trip to Mexico Crowley took was to explore oil prospects and that his trip to China was to monitor opium trade. Most infamously, they both claim that Crowley's pro-German work during the Great War was actually him being a double agent for Britain and that his writing was to make the Germans look ridiculous in the eyes of the American public. The evidence, in my opinion, is sorely lacking for these claims.

Crowley the Mountaineer

As mentioned before, Crowley was a lifelong mountaineer, even leading some expeditions in his time. The two most famous examples were in 1902, when Crowley would be joined in India by his loyal friend Oscar Eckenstein and several other mountaineers to begin the Eckenstein-Crowley expedition to conquer K2, the second-highest mountain on Earth. The expedition was filled with illness and unfortunate circumstances, with Crowley contracting influenza snow blindness and other members falling ill too. They reached an altitude of 20,000 feet before turning back.

For the second most infamous example, Crowley decided to climb Kanchenjunga, a notoriously treacherous mountain, with four other mountaineers: Jacot-Guillarmod, Charles Adolphe Reymond, Alexis Pache, and Alcesti C. Rigo de Righi. The expedition was a disaster. The group fought constantly, mostly over the fact that they considered Crowley dangerous and reckless. Eventually, the four men mutinied against Crowley and headed back down the mountain just as night approached. Crowley, allegedly, insisted they stay because it would be far too dangerous. They ignored him and Pache, along with several porters, was killed in an accident that same evening. Crowley was widely blamed for their deaths. Shortly after, he would try to get funding and support for a second expedition up Kanchenjunga before giving up and returning to Britain.

Crowley the Poet

Crowley was a lifelong writer, following in the footsteps of his father. He considered himself among the greatest poets to ever live, but his work never fared very well. Most of his poem collections were erotic or about love in some way. His collection White Stains, a decadent collection of erotic poetry, was only published abroad to avoid Britain's decency laws.

His most successful work, besides later-life occult and Thelema texts, were his self-published republishings of his poetry, Crowley's Collected Works, which received strong reviews, both good and negative, but never was commercially successful. To drum up publicity, he issued an essay contest with a 100-pound reward for the best essay on his work. The winner was J.F.C. Fuller, a former British Army Officer and historian, who proclaimed in his essay The Star in the West that Crowley's poetry was some of the greatest ever written.

There were times he would try his hand at writing short stories, but his fiction was mildly received and hardly stands the test of time. Of course, there were his political pieces which as mentioned before lended themselves to Fascism and other less-than-favorable ideologies.

Crowley the Bastard

Crowley, for all his doings, was largely a bastard. He was a spoiled upper-class brat who carried strong racial and social prejudices against his fellow man. In one famous example, Crowley beat Victor Neuburg with stinging nettles while verbally abusing and berating him for being Jewish. He also beat his wife and various partners over his lifetime to prove his dominance over them. During the Kanchenjunga expedition, several porters complained to Guillarmod that they were tired of Crowley beating them, with many of the porters leaving because of it. Crowley only admitted to beating one for "his own good and that of the expedition."

Crowley was also notorious for holding grudges and would take any opportunity to disparage anyone who he perceived as wronging him. Biographer Gary Lachman shared an example of this in his book Aleister Crowley: Magick, Rock and Roll, and the Wickedest Man in the World, "Remembering the ill-treatment he had received at Ebor School in Cambridge nearly a half-century earlier, he wrote in his Confessions that soon after he left, the headmaster, Rev. H. d'Arcy Champney went insane and the school closed down. Neither recollection was accurate, but Crowley enjoyed vilifying his enemies; pages of his Confessions are dedicated to this type of revenge."

Many, including adherents, have criticized Thelema for sexism and described Crowley's work as being misogynistic. Martin Booth believes that this misogyny arose from Crowley's mother issues and their bad relationship. Crowley has been quoted as saying women are "moral inferiors" who had to be treated with "firmness, kindness, and justice."

Crowley the Addict

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Aleister Crowley taken between 1945 and 1947 at Netherwood, Hastings

As mentioned before, Crowley spent much of his life using narcotics to enhance his magick, often to his own detriment. When the Crowley family traveled to Southern China for a tour, Crowley decided the best course of action was to smoke as much Opium as he could while practicing the "Bornless Ritual," an invocation to his Holy Guardian Angel. Around 1920, a doctor prescribed him heroin, and he became hopelessly addicted, which would plague him for the rest of his life.

At one point in his life, Crowley would reconnect with his friend and mentor George Jones, and together they would perform the Abramelin rituals at Ashdown Park Hotel. Crowley believed that these rituals helped him attain Samadahi, a term in various Indian religions that roughly means a meditative state of consciousness, which would mark, in his words, a turning point in his life. He was also smoking an alarming amount of hashish during these rituals and even penned an essay entitled The Psychology of Hashish, which he proclaimed an important aid to his mysticism.

Crowley would also try countless psychedelics throughout his life and would become addicted to cocaine. Crowley's most normal of substances was his rum-soaked straight Perique that he smoked out of a pipe. There is evidence that Crowley smoked other blends from local tobacconists, but none are as famous as the Perique.

Crowley's Legacy

Despite Crowley's many pitfalls, he is an influential figure in both the occult and in popular culture. In 2002, despite his traitor's past, Crowley was ranked 73 in a list of the 100 Greatest Britons. Thelema continues to be a small but passionate religion in esoteric groups, but even outside of it, several traditions have been inspired by it like Gardnerian Wicca. Of course, many academics have written about Crowley's life with various interpretations and opinions.

In popular culture, he's inspired a slew of characters in fiction. In the novel, The Devil Rides Out by Dennis Wheatley, Crowley is half the inspiration for the character Damien Mocata. He was depicted on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band by The Beatles. His motto, "Do What Thou Wilt" was inscribed in the vinyl of Led Zeppelin's Led Zeppelin III. Ozzy Osbourne, David Bowie, and others have made references to Crowley's writing, and his life has inspired lyrics or songs by them. The famous video game Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain uses a quote from Magick in Theory and Practice during its opening.

He's also the inspiration behind returning fan-favorite, Cornell & Diehl's Small Batch: The Beast. The Beast takes Crowley's infamous rum-soaked straight Perique and turns it into something with nuance and grace. C&D's Director and Head Blender Jeremy Reeves expertly crafted a blend of 51% genuine St. James Parish Perique as well as a supporting cast of C&D's proprietary Red Virginia Cavendish and a whisper of Dark-Fired Kentucky to add complexity and balance before the mixture was steeped in rum for seven days to deepen the flavors. It offers complex umami notes with elements of sweet stone fruits, mesquite wood, and freshly cracked black pepper.

"A little Perique adds spiciness and stewed-plum flavor to a blend. The more Perique you add, the more complex flavors it begins to offer, like mushroom and soy sauce, along with a more pronounced stone-fruit character," shared Jeremy Reeves.

The Beast lurks within the shadows, primed and ready to pounce — but you have the opportunity to strike first and capture it for your own collection when it arrives on-site on April 1 at 6:00 p.m. ET.

Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast | Daily Reader

Bibliography

  • Booth, M. (2001). A magick life: A biography of aleister crowley. Coronet Books.
  • Lachman, G. (2014).Aleister Crowley: Magick, Rock and Roll, and the wickedest man in the world. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin, a member of Penguin Group (USA).
  • Readdy, K. (2019). One truth and one spirit: Aleister Crowley's spiritual legacy. Ibis Press.
  • Symonds, J. (1997). Beast 666 - life of Aleister Crowley. Pindar Press.
  • Moore, J. S. (2009). Aleister Crowley: A modern master. Mandrake.
  • Spence, R. B. (2008). Secret agent 666: Aleister Crowley, British Intelligence and the occult. Feral House; Turnaround distributor.
  • Churton, T. (2014). Aleister Crowley: The biography: Spiritual revolutionary, romantic explorer, Occult Master and spy. Watkins Publishing.
Category:   Tobacco Talk
Tagged in:   Cornell and Diehl Small Batch Tobacco

Comments

  • jiaxing.li on March 30, 2025

    上架请通知我购买,谢谢!!!

    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • The Duke on March 30, 2025

    Why in the world would you want to name a tobacco after a twisted, evil, son of satan?
    Makes me wonder who C&D admire...
    Fkn sick if you ask me.

    61
    9
    17
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jason F. on March 31, 2025

      I couldn't agree more. Bad marketing. Get some real heroes maybe. Not this odometer. I wouldn't want to participate in anything that was near and dear to him. Good riddance

      28
      1
      10
      Reply
      Cancel
      • brightwood83 on April 6, 2025

        Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. I ordered two tins. 😈

        3
        2
    • richnewman on March 31, 2025

      This may come as a shock to you, but not everyone is a Christian. I hope they follow up this blend with one dedicated to The Satanic Temple...

      19
      1
      25
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

        Not everyone is an anything. That’s not an argument. Piss on my shoe, I’ll be the one talking.

        6
        2
        6
      • Alex K. on March 31, 2025

        Might as well make a Hitler blend then. Your morals are weak.

        19
        1
        11
      • jwr0201 on April 2, 2025

        Careful what you wish for!

        1
        1
        1
      • Matthew M. on April 2, 2025

        I could not agree more.

        3
        1
    • Connor D. on April 7, 2025

      I'm with you 100%. Definitely won't be supporting this site nor Cornell&Diehl ever in the future.

      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • dmbehsman on March 30, 2025

    What in the world is the matter with Cornell and Diehl? You're commemorating a devil worshipper with a pipe tobacco blend? George Lincoln Rockwell was a pipe smoker. Why not commemorate him with a blend called "The Master Blend" with nothing but blond Virginia tobacco? Or maybe commemorate Stalin with a blend of red Virginia tobacco and call it, "Breaking 30 Million Eggs"?

    This is really disgusting.

    55
    9
    15
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Greybeard on March 30, 2025

      How about pipe blend called "Gulag" for Stalin? I questioned this last year too when they released Beast. Why would you take inspiration from such a sick man?

      30
      10
      Reply
      Cancel
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Oh, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Comparing Crowley, an occultist who never killed anyone, to a mass murderer. Are you sure that's tobacco you're smoking in your pipe?

        7
        1
        7
      • Greybeard on April 8, 2025

        @Michael Hughes The forum doesn't allow me to reply directly to you so it will appear out of order. Nobody is comparing Crowley to Stalin. The point is if you're going to deliberately celebrate a wicked man like Crowley, why have any boundaries at all, and just go ahead and celebrate a man like Stalin too. If you don't want to celebrate Stalin too, then you also have a line in which you will not cross. Many here are saying lightened up or something similar, but would probably protest a Stalin blend the same way some are protesting a Crowley blend.

        4
      • Alexander H. on April 27, 2025

        @MichaelMHughes Evil is evil, and if one worships Satan, one worships all evil including murder. It is no stretch of the imagination, but rather those who use devil worship just to glorify their own lust, and their other choice sins, who are gravely ignorant of this. Occultism is evil and inherently harmful. It is paraded publicly in these days and those who do aren't looking too well-off, either.

        1
  • Jakob K. on March 30, 2025

    Well, what a terrible, terrible idea. Done buying anything from C&D, including several tobaccos I very much enjoy and would otherwise continue stocking. Shame on everyone involved.

    36
    3
    16
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Phil Yearout on March 30, 2025

    I recall stumbling upon a book, The Book of Lies, by one Frater Perdurabo (who I later leaned was Crowley) while in college. A strange and perplexing tome, that. Thank you for the insights into this very odd but interesting character.

    16
    1
    7
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Jorge L. on March 30, 2025

    Interesting read! Definitely gotta pick up 'the beast' next time it's in stock :)

    14
    1
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Matthew W. on March 30, 2025

    yeah maybe introducing a blend based on Aleister Crowley wasn't the best marketing idea for the fairly conservative pipe smoking world as indicated by some of these comments. When C&D introduced the Lovecraftian-themed blends that luckily must have sailed over heads.
    This was a great read! Learned a lot of stuff I didn't know about the guy. For more Crowley-related weirdness, check out the long story about his house on Loch Ness.
    I'll have to grab a tin of this stuff, put on some Coil and dim the lights. Cheers!

    22
    1
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 30, 2025

      HP Lovecraft is very different from Crowley. Nonsensical comparison. I gladly bought some blends inspired by classic, well-written horror stories; I have no interest in supporting "honoring" an open occultist. Very different.

      28
      1
      11
      Reply
      Cancel
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Open occultist here. We smoke pipes and enjoy tobacco, too. We are also tolerant of others' beliefs, as long as they are not harming anyone. And Lovecraft was a reprehensible bigot—just as bad, maybe more so than Crowley. Nonetheless, I enjoy their very purple prose.

        11
        4
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Also, if you actually read Crowley, you'd realize much of his occultism is based in Kabbalah (esoteric Judaism), and even some Christian ideas. Sure, it's not for everyone (it's not my thing), but although he was flawed like every human being and could be an enormous jerk and misogynist at times, he was enormously influential and certainly quite the character. So a blend in his honor makes absolute sense, certainly as much so as Lovecraft's creations.

        8
        6
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Also, if you actually read Crowley, you'd realize much of his occultism is based in Kabbalah (esoteric Judaism), and even some Christian ideas. Sure, it's not for everyone (it's not my thing), but although he was flawed like every human being and could be an enormous jerk and misogynist at times, he was enormously influential and certainly quite the character. So a blend in his honor makes absolute sense, certainly as much so as Lovecraft's creations.

        6
        4
      • Gregory S. on April 3, 2025

        Lovecraft was a rabid racist.

        3
  • WILLIAM on March 30, 2025

    Smoke what you will shall be the whole of the law!

    24
    5
    10
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Shawn on March 30, 2025

    Cool tribute a controversial and important figure in Western occultism.

    17
    2
    17
    Reply
    Cancel
  • George S. on March 30, 2025

    I agree with the negative sentiments already expressed by other (loyal) customers. Know your audience/know your customers. Don’t cater to the weird 1%. Whoever agreed to post this needs to (re) examine the vision, mission, values, and culture of the organization. A “smoking pipe” is not the sole criteria for getting through the gate. In simple terms, and this applies to all leaders and subsidiary lines of effort at Laudisi - Don’t be weird!!

    44
    2
    17
    Reply
    Cancel
    • AnonymousDad on April 1, 2025

      Go woke, go broke!

      9
      1
      7
      Reply
      Cancel
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Brilliant, you're a poet just like Crowley!

        I'd rather be woke than closed-minded or a bigot.

        8
        9
      • Tookish on April 3, 2025

        No to be fair, there are a lot of conservative or libertarian (i.e. Non-Woke) occultists. You can't just assume because it is occult related that it has anything to do with woke idealogy.

        3
        2
    • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

      LOL, as a proud member of the 1% weird, my money spends just as well as yours. I'd rather be weird than boring and sanctimonious any day. Cheers to the weird!

      11
      2
      8
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Bob S. on March 30, 2025

    Naming this as you have may have been a neat idea in 2021 but the world seems to be changing in ways that celebrates what this tobacco would support and forgets that one of the pleasures of pipes is to blot out the world.

    8
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
  • William M. on March 30, 2025

    Interesting article, but I had always been told that Crowley was strictly a Latakia man. I was wondering why this blend was chosen?

    1
    7
    Reply
    Cancel
  • George S. on March 30, 2025

    At an historical point in the industry when the vision is for C&D to fill the void left by STG and the Sutliff/MacBaren strategy, Laudisi needs to get disciplined, while still remaining fun and creative. Rose has written an excellent article here from a technical standpoint - that’s not the issue. The issue is product naming/marketing and taking a “time out” to run the product through the cycle. It’s called market research - which comes well before product launch.

    Let’s take the opportunity here to think of better names for this blend. Huge amounts of Perique and rum, may be some imaginary “danger” in spice - “splicing the mainbrace” comes to mind.

    "Splice the mainbrace" is a nautical idiom, originally an order to repair a ship's main brace, but now commonly used to mean to celebrate or issue an extra ration of alcohol, particularly rum, to the crew.

    Nautical Origins:
    In the days of sail, the "main brace" was a thick rope used to brace the main yard of a square-rigged ship.

    Repair and Celebration:
    The order to "splice the mainbrace" initially meant to repair the main brace, often after a storm or battle.

    Evolving Meaning:
    Over time, the phrase evolved to signify a celebratory occasion, especially when the crew was given an extra ration of rum or grog.

    Modern Usage:
    While daily rum rations are no longer standard in many navies, the phrase "splice the mainbrace" continues to be used to denote a celebratory occasion or the granting of an extra ration of alcohol.

    Example:
    "After a successful voyage, the captain ordered the crew to 'splice the mainbrace' to celebrate their hard work."

    You got this!! Let’s go!!

    9
    1
    14
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Josh C. on March 31, 2025

      Product launch? Check when this actually debuted as this isn't the 1st (or 2nd) time it's been produced. This will still sell out as that's the nature of these limited/ FOMO blends no matter what they're called

      8
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Alexander H. on April 27, 2025

      Great idea!

      Reply
      Cancel
  • Josh C. on March 30, 2025

    I think most of you need to loosen up! If you think this blend actually honors or contributes monetarily to Crowley in some way you're out of touch.
    Crowley simply made popular the idea of smoking rum soaked perique so C&D took that idea and built up on it. Just the idea of the tobacco, nothing more. If they didn't say the conclusion first many people would have come to it eventually.
    In this day and age if you can't separate someone's personal beliefs from their art (music, poetry, etc) or in this case his practices from the way he enjoyed his tobacco you're going to live a very miserable life. Good grief. Also, this will sell out in 2 hours like every other small batch drop does now that MacBaren has shuttered.

    27
    1
    17
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 30, 2025

      Would you accept that there's a difference between, say, tobacco blends inspired by HP Lovecraft stories and tobacco blends inspired by what he named his cat? If you would, then you may retract your "loosen up" comment now. This blend is literally called "The Beast" and that's not a reference to Nessie or a French fairy tale.

      12
      1
      10
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Josh C. on March 30, 2025

        You may call me uneducated for this but I have very little knowledge of HP Lovecraft other than knowing that some had a fascination for his works. If someone introduced me to a tobacco blend named after him, his works, or his cat, and I enjoyed said blend it wouldn't matter what it was called or referenced.
        I still believe people are too caught up in nonsense to just enjoy something on face value.
        I opened up my tin of the last release of The Beast and found it interesting but the flavors are not something I would reach for often. I won't be purchasing the re release simply because it's not a flavor I enjoy, it has nothing to do with a fanciful backstory.
        If I DID enjoy the blend I would buy more and wouldn't care what it was called or referenced as that's not what my purchase was for. Do what you will with that remark but it feels like the majority of you are saying if you buy this tin of tobacco you may as well be saying "hail Satan" on the street corner and that is complete nonsense.

        8
        1
    • PD on March 31, 2025

      Right. He is simply a rather no-talent goof who found ways to make a living doing nothing of real value. Occultism? Really? Shhhh..... there is no such thing.
      The article is well written, but the subject is tedious, and uninteresting.
      Aleister Crowley: the person whose name I have never heard, and now I know why!

      Oh, 50 % perique sounds pretty disgusting

      1
      3
      10
      Reply
      Cancel
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Maybe consider that your views and the things that interest you do not define what is interesting to others. And occultism is most certainly real, and you're welcome to explore my library anytime to discover what it's all about.

        5
        1
        5
      • Tookish on April 3, 2025

        As Michael here said, it is most certainly real. But I am inclined to agree with you that a 50% perique blend doesn't sound all that great to me.

        1
  • Casey M. on March 30, 2025

    Definitely makes me raise a brow in surprise why they would glorify a man like this for naming a tobacco. At least that’s the way it comes across. Normally you don’t name things after something you despise or strongly disagree with but I guess that’s just my way of thinking. Definitely doesn’t seem like a real smart decision on marketing to the pipe smoking community to me but maybe they are aiming for an extremely small segment in selling this as I think they definitely cut off a lot of sales with this tactic. Definitely changed my whole outlook on what I pictured C&D to be about. Saw this and just had to say wow, not what I expected for sure. Article was well written and informative. I read it just out of curiosity of what made a man be that way but it is definitely surprising to see a label that seemingly pays homage to him. Really blown away that the marketing team would think that was a good idea…But like I said maybe they are try to sell very few to a an extremely small minority. Seems counter intuitive to a sales company and risk turning off more buyers. The name alone without a story would have probably sold a lot of tins cus that is what a lot of smokers are looking for is something robust with some teeth to it. Just my two cents.

    24
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
  • ☘️🥃 on March 30, 2025

    Ephesians 4:27 ...and do not give the devil a foothold. HAPPY EASTER, everyone!🕊️✝️🌱🙏

    40
    5
    8
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Alex K. on March 30, 2025

    It seems that most people with common sense share the sentiment that surrounding the background of this blend in such a wicked person is ridiculous. You could have named it after a monster or something. The fact that you named it after an actual human monster which the very article states was an abuse with a cruel and evil nature but he is praised for his “literary contributions” is wild.

    I understand this tobacco blend has been coming out for years but at this point I don’t want to support C&D after this article confirmed to me that yall know fully well how much a disturbed pervert this man was, who literally encouraged people to sacrifice young boys (whether or not he did/ believed such things they still have an effect).

    For a man that Satan deceived into thinking he was the antichrist, his moniker “the beast” fills me with sadness. Don’t be self deceived like this man if you are actually into witch craft. Repent and believe in Jesus, he will take your burdens and confusion and bring you peace and healing.

    38
    3
    11
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Scott F. on March 30, 2025

    Hard Pass. C.S. Lewis is a far better example of a human being and Three Nuns is a better suggestion for a smoke. But don’t take my word for it. William H. writes, “ this stuff has zero attributes of perique and by the time it got blended with rum, cavendish, burley and God knows what else, the characteristics of perique have disappeared entirely”. Jewman22 adds, “ It tastes awful, yes there is a spiciness to it, and a little sweetness, but overall it just kinda ended up tasting like a fart”. Personally, I’m beginning to think that American tobacco companies are more about marketing and less about quality blends. I’ve yet to find a C&D blend that lives up to the hype and delivers the “wow” factor on first light. As for the association with a drug addicted occultist, I would advise SmokingPipes to “read the room.” Many of us pipers are the salt of the earth type and not ones to relate to opium dens and unfettered indulgence. I imagine the author of this piece, Rose Kiser, felt a bit like Lewis when he wrote The Screwtape Letters. Writing the mind of a devil isn’t a pleasant experience.

    35
    3
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
    • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

      I'm in "the room," and I have enjoyed reading Crowley's works over the years. And Crowley was not a devil worshiper, he pretended to be one to freak out the conservatives of his time (and apparently it's still working, LOL). He was also abused in a very strict fundamentalist church as a child, and much of his affected persona was a reaction to that abuse by intolerant and violent Christians.

      Also, not everyone is a Christian (I admire the life of Christ, but I am not religious), and not every occultist is a satanist. Many non-Christians do not believe in Satan, so why would they worship something they don't believe exists?

      8
      2
      4
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        The "not everyone" argument is valid, as far as it goes, but I hold that separate from what these things mean to me. If we depended on prevalence to qualify our views, we would all be in trouble in one way or another -- as I am sure you know! But yes, we should always maintain the community perspective -- which shouldn't necessarily limit what we have to say, but should inform how we say it.

        3
      • Scott F. on April 6, 2025

        I would venture to guess that, among most pipers, you would be the exception rather than the rule, though I’m not so naive as to think that everyone believes the same way I do. And dissenting opinions and beliefs don’t bother me. What irritates me is that SmokingPipes had to know that this subject would agitate a lot of Believers who happen to be pipers, especially in the weeks leading up to Easter. So why do this now if not to accomplish exactly that? And if that is the case, what does that say about how this company views people like me? Is there a malignancy to this? It certainly seems suspect. And if that is the case, do I really want to patronize a company that has that much disdain for my beliefs? I’d say all of these are fair questions.

        3
  • Evan S. on March 30, 2025

    Geeze, I knew these guys were mullet wielding hipsters, but come on. Religion aside, Crowley is still someone best left aside, especially when trying to sell to many who wouldn’t want a thing to do with that man.

    27
    1
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Loren G. on March 30, 2025

    Quoting a bible or telling people to repent and believe in jesus is just as wacky as witchcraft. As much evil has been done in the name of christianity as in the name of Crowley.

    20
    20
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Alex K. on March 30, 2025

      Not true. The Bible states that you should loves your neighbor. The parable of the good Samaritan is where Jesus shows that people should actually love people that are racially and culturally different than them.

      No one who is actually a Christian and a child of God who follows of the Bible, would ever do whatever heinous things you’re thinking of. Jesus says that the people who loved him follow his commandments.

      If you love, Alistair Crowley, and then you follow his commandments, which are to rape, murder and blaspheme. The two forces which you have mentioned are diametrically opposed.

      19
      1
      8
      Reply
      Cancel
    • ☘️🥃 on March 30, 2025

      What a wacky thing to say. There is plenty of scripture describing such actions done by fake Christians. You will know them by their fruits. Matthew 7:15:
      "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves".
      2 Corinthians 11:13-15:
      "For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works".
      Matthew 7:21-23
      "Not everyone who says to me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name cast out demons and perform many miracles?” Then I will declare to them, “I never knew you. Go away from me, you evildoers.” A little reading and reflection go a long way.

      12
      1
      8
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Joshua S. on April 2, 2025

      Not true at all that "As much evil has been done in the name of christianity as in the name of Crowley." Far more has been done in the name of christianity, by numerous cultures throughout thousands of years of history. There's not even a comparison to be made here, outside of comparing the size of an acorn to that of an entire forest.

      I'm happy to stock up my den of iniquity with tins festooned in admiration for the darker side of indulgence. The pearl-clutching from the twisted panties brigade just makes it all the more enjoyable. "How dare a company market using language that doesn't appeal to my social and religious comfort zones!"

      3
      6
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Alexander H. on April 27, 2025

        Christianity is inseparable from Western Civilization. Judeo-Christian heritage is why our governments function as they do, and we believe so deeply in freedom of speech. I imagine much of your examples of this evil are actually false; for example, the First Holy Crusade was a necessary response to years of Ottoman expansion. They were on Europe's door, and the Pope managed to get all the Kingdoms to unite under one banner. After centuries of the Ottomans conquering Eastern Christendom, they were stopped at Europe's doorstep. They had taken the southern tip of Spain. My point is, you disregard and call evil what you don't know, and in doing so you throw out the Baby with the bath water ~ and in this case, the Divine Infant. Learn about the benefits of Western Civilization's roots. Thinking like you do has lead people to be culturally suicidal.

        1
  • Loren G. on March 30, 2025

    The old "if someone did something bad they were fake christians and it no way no how reflects on christianity." I think any religion can claim that excuse.

    6
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 30, 2025

      It's as easy as comparing actual teachings to see the difference but that seems beyond your mental capacity.

      6
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • ☘️🥃 on March 30, 2025

      There is some truth to what you say, Loren, but this platform is too small to get into a deep debate (and there is nothing to debate, @Jakob K. summed it up nicely: Compare the teachings.) Scripture is short enough to suffice. John 1:5
      King James Version
      5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

      11
      4
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Loren G. on March 30, 2025

        Ralph 2:37 And thou maketh scripture references ad nauseam which meaneth nothing

        5
        1
        12
      • ☘️🥃 on March 30, 2025

        @Loren G.: Your Ralph 2:37 comment was humorous. I wanted to meet you in the middle (a sense of humor is a sign of intelligence), but I can see that won't happen here. To quote something I've read in Buddhist teachings "Just because you can contend with an ox, doesn't mean that you should contend with an ox." Scripture means everything: John 1:1-5
        King James Version
        1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

        2 The same was in the beginning with God.

        3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

        4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

        5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. / I hope that you'll find truth good, and peace in your mortal life time. Your very existence and consciousness should cause you to question and seek the truth. But even Pilot asked Jesus what is truth, some people don't know.

        8
        5
  • Wolfram V. on March 30, 2025

    C&D's Exclusive claims 50% perique, but that blend strikes me as bland and uninteresting. Why would the Beast be any different? I don't buy into the hype. If you want to dally with smoking perique, just buy some and have at it. Experiment with it. Smoke it straight. Blend it. Soak it rum too.

    2
    1
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Tookish on April 3, 2025

      I'm also taking a hard pass on the 50% pepper-fest lol

      Reply
      Cancel
    • Tookish on April 3, 2025

      I'm also taking a hard pass on the 50% pepper-fest lol

      Reply
      Cancel
  • Evan S. on March 30, 2025

    I don’t think anyone was really clamoring for Evangelical pipe tobacco in any fashion, and this is coming from a Catholic. Whatever your beliefs and how the pipe fits into it, most seem to keep the pipe and tobacco itself separate. It isn’t unreasonable to not want to associate with occultism, even in a somewhat offhand and tenuous way.

    15
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
    • 🦇💩🤪 on March 30, 2025

      "Whatever your beliefs and how the pipe fits into it, most seem to keep the pipe and tobacco itself separate." If pipe smokers keep their pipe and tobacco separate then there will be no pipe smoking goin' on, duh🙄 That's like saying that I keep my food and stomach separate, my toothpaste and toothbrush separate, my gas and gas tank separate, or my butt and toilet paper separate. Don't be a clamoring Catholic. Father Dempsey, Presbyterian, and Three Nuns filled the void.

      5
      2
      5
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Evan S. on March 30, 2025

        This guy for president.

        2
        4
      • Evan S. on March 30, 2025

        This guy for president.

        2
        1
        4
    • AnonymousDad on April 1, 2025

      This is exactly correct. Read the room. Know your customer. It's ludicrous that they would do this during the lenten season and I'm not even a Catholic.

      11
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

      Sure, if you don't want to associate with occultism, then don't. You can also just not buy a tobacco associated with an occultist. That's the free market for you! On the other hand, I will buy this, and I think it's a great bit of marketing. Again—isn't the free market great?

      3
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Tookish on April 3, 2025

      I suppose, but people aren't really up in arms about Father Dempsey are they? It is an American company so it must go both ways. That's how we preserve our freedoms.

      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Mike R. on March 30, 2025

    Get over yourselves in the comments, bunch of babies. Just enjoy the smoke and the history lesson.

    21
    2
    16
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 30, 2025

      We will not "get over ourselves". If your apathetic secular nature is offended by our distaste for Satanism and debauchery, well, we don't really give a damn. Grow up and deal with it. ;)

      17
      1
      15
      Reply
      Cancel
    • mtvernon on March 31, 2025

      Personal feelings aside, I’ve been in marketing most of my life. This should be a case study in bad marketing if your goal is to sell to the widest group of people possible. It’s just a huge swing and a miss and the evidence is all the comments backing that up.

      19
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

        Exactly. I am a tick or two below "fart in an elevator" offended by this, and it's about 60% Crowley himself and 40% the lousy marketing. I would not be as offended if this weren't also my first serious, sustained observance of Lent, and somehow, this also is unfortunate at a moment when C&D could be banking goodwill following the STG debacle. It's just, "Why would you be this electively dumb about a release?"

        14
        1
        2
  • 🦇💩🤪 on March 30, 2025

    OZZY for president🦇 https://youtu.be/mpOPaUq7TU8?feature=shared

    5
    1
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Nick C. on March 30, 2025

    An article like this is enough for me to consider never buying from this company ever again. Quite a lengthy biography on a despicable human who taught despicable things on the eve of the satanic masses that have been perpetuating the country is either a huge oversight, terrible timing, or all on purpose. A massive post on a man who perpuates Satanism and the occult? Frankly disgusting content from this author, this company, and this website.

    25
    2
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Morg on March 31, 2025

      Well said Sir!

      4
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

      Let's put energy, also, into the hope of better understanding going forward. Christian judgment should point others to grace and restoration; we all need it, and it's a limited-time release of the best thing ever. "Do better" should be an encouragement, because -- well, doing better is entirely possible with God's patient help. (Again, one of the lessons of Lent.)

      My experience tells me these are square-dealing people who made a blunder; one person's "edgy" is another's "over the line." But yes, I do hope the parties understand this part of their tradition-leaning market a little better now and switch up their presentation of what sounds like a distinctive blend. I would buy some next year simply to salute a rebrand.

      9
      4
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jakob K. on March 31, 2025

        Indeed, rebranding as a show of good faith would prompt me to get some as well.

        6
        4
      • Alex K. on March 31, 2025

        This blend has been coming out for years. Do not expect it to be rebranded especially when plenty of “Christians” buy it anyway.

        I believe it was the first small batch released almost 10 years ago but I’ve just decided to never buy the blend because I was uncomfortable with the background of it. The straw that broke the camels back for me was the in-depth article articulating his absolutely sinister acts and ideals.

        There is no excuse now to speak of just using him as a part of the cultural zeitgeist. You literally spelled out every disgusting reason he should not be a mascot for your blend and your own conscience ought to offend you after this long-winded depiction of an untalented clout chasing pervert.

        Also side note, so many C&D blends taste much too similar to me. I just don’t enjoy the way they process their leaf so sadly even though they are the last big producer in America I just don’t need to buy their blends anymore. Watch City is where my money is at.

        8
        3
    • richnewman on April 1, 2025

      Right...like we all don't know you'll be buying it like everyone else. Save the fake outrage for real world problems--like Christo Fascism and White Nationalism.

      2
      6
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        @Randal W. Please don't go there. It's not a valid basis for critique, and it's inherently disrespectful* to both of you. Rose is loved by God and a dedicated writer. Gender identity doesn't matter and makes a poor throwing tomato, both because it's mean-spirited and because it's unoriginal.

        * Disrespectful: I have gotten good mileage out of framing my responses in terms of "becoming the person who said/did that." When I come out the other side of an experience, I want to be reasonably proud of that person and on good terms with others, even when we disagree. Anything less is letting myself down, too. All of social media is pushing us in the other direction, so it's easy to fall into it. Please excuse me for the sermon, but this framing has helped me this year and might be worth a thought. We are constantly making ourselves, even with the small stuff. (This framing also helps me put unfairness from others in a better perspective: "Well, apparently that's who they chose to become.")

        1
        1
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        @Randal W. Please don't go there. It's not a valid basis for critique, and it's inherently disrespectful* to both of you. Rose is loved by God and a dedicated writer. Gender identity doesn't matter and makes a poor throwing tomato, both because it's mean-spirited and because it's unoriginal.

        * Disrespectful: I have gotten good mileage out of framing my responses in terms of "becoming the person who said/did that." When I come out the other side of an experience, I want to be reasonably proud of that person and on good terms with others, even when we disagree. Anything less is letting myself down, too. All of social media is pushing us in the other direction, so it's easy to fall into it. Please excuse me for the sermon, but this framing has helped me this year and might be worth a thought. We are constantly making ourselves, even with the small stuff. (This framing also helps me put unfairness from others in a better perspective: "Well, apparently that's who they chose to become.")

        2
    • Joshua S. on April 2, 2025

      "Only my religious biases should be coddled!"

      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Jon O. on March 30, 2025

    I agree with the overwhelming majority of comments on this article, which are respectfully admonishing C&D and Laudisi against the distasteful mistake of honoring an evil, self-admitted worshipper of Satan. This is not a topic to be played around with. It is not quirky or edgy—it is wrong. And for your own personal safety at the very least, you do not invite Satan into your life.

    The author should also keep from injecting her personal negative opinion of specific Christian denominations into her writing, referring to them as “extreme Christian fundamentalists” and calling their views “sordid”, among other commentary. It’s unprofessional, and I would hope that Laudisi would not appreciate being represented in this way.

    Like another commenter, I had assumed that C&D did not necessarily know the extent of evil behind the name until I read this painfully elaborate exposé on the human monster. Knowing everything that is written here and what is behind the man who “inspired” this blend, I cannot conceive of a business thinking it is a good idea to launch a product marketed in this way and to actively promote the story around it.

    I have bought all of C&D’s other small batch releases, but I do not buy this one.

    24
    1
    8
    Reply
    Cancel
    • mtvernon on March 31, 2025

      Hear, hear. I agree 100% with this. Really bad post that needlessly polarizes their loyal audience.

      10
      1
      4
      Reply
      Cancel
  • 🍺🎅🏿👍 on March 31, 2025

    Great article! Looking forward to picking up a few tins. The comments by the idiot butthurt Christians never disappoint.

    12
    17
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 31, 2025

      Good luck selling that advertising strategy to a consumer base of Tolkien and Lewis fans. Maybe you should stick to weed!

      14
      1
      7
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jakob K. on March 31, 2025

        I was already on the site regularly, the difference is I used to buy stuff. Maybe you should ask Budweiser if they believe "all attention is good attention"?

        13
        5
      • 🍺🎅🏿👍 on March 31, 2025

        The advertising strategy must be working pretty well. It’s kept you on this site nonstop for two days.

        4
        1
        8
    • 🥃🎅👍🏻 on March 31, 2025

      It's obvious that this getting released during the same month as the Easter holiday, to cause a ruckus, to provoke, and get attention. You have every right to be an ignorant idiot(it's a free country, no law against being stupid), enjoy the beast, your goats blood, and budlight🍺🐐🩸🌈

      9
      1
      9
      Reply
      Cancel
      • 🍺🎅🏿👍 on March 31, 2025

        Thanks, I will!!👍👍
        Enjoy your butthurt !
        🍆💦

        3
        5
      • Morg on March 31, 2025

        Excellent reply!!

        4
        3
      • 🍺🎅🏿👍 on March 31, 2025

        Thanks, I will!!👍👍
        Enjoy your butthurt !
        🍆💦

        3
        5
  • Don S. on March 31, 2025

    Marketing advisability aside , this is an utterly fascinating and engaging biography You rarely find this quality of research and writing in leading journals. To find it on a tobacco and pipe marketing site is truly remarkable. Congratulations to the author on an exceptionally well-written piece .

    15
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

      It is a very strong piece of writing -- well researched, professionally written at the paragraph level, advances the profile with depth while maintaining forward movement, and with helpful thematic organization. Rose has talent for sure, and I hope this episode isn't too discouraging, but rather one of those uncomfortably good learning moments for someone who is going to be reaching audiences for years to come.

      7
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Kevin B. on March 31, 2025

    I tried this blend the last time it came out. It's very satisfying and pleasurable to smoke. I enjoyed it so much that I shared it with a friend across the country. I'm looking forward to getting a few more tins to enjoy.

    4
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

    The point has been made, but some of us take this about the same as we would take a Jeffery Dahmer blend.

    15
    1
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Casey Moss on March 31, 2025

      That was my first thought as well. I’m sure a Diddy blend will be next in line…

      6
      4
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
    • That1Guy on March 31, 2025

      ....ever heard of 19 Crimes wines? Literally prisoner photos on the labels too. Terrible point. Just choose to not be butt hurt.

      3
      1
      7
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

        My offense at the Beast branding… is a terrible point… because someone (checks notes)… puts convicts on wine labels.

        3
        2
        3
  • Morg on March 31, 2025

    Well there it is! This speaks volumes for Smoking Pipes! Good bye SP!

    12
    3
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Luke R. on March 31, 2025

    Why I Will No Longer Support SmokingPipes.com
    I was deeply disappointed to read SmokingPipes.com’s recent article romanticizing Aleister Crowley. The piece portrays him as a misunderstood mystic and presents Christianity as a repressive foil to his so-called enlightenment. This narrative is not only historically dishonest—it’s morally offensive.

    Aleister Crowley was not a harmless eccentric. He was an occultist who practiced ritual sex magic, openly blasphemed Christianity, and lived in profound moral and psychological ruin. His own Confessions detail drug abuse, manipulation, and identification as “The Beast 666.” Biographers confirm he encouraged harmful rituals, some of which led to the death or mental collapse of his followers (Sutin, Do What Thou Wilt, 242–245; Churton, Aleister Crowley, 385–410).

    Even more troubling is the decision to name a pipe tobacco blend after Crowley—an individual who reveled in perversion, sorcery, and anti-Christian blasphemy. This is not an act of clever marketing; it is the celebration of moral degeneracy. To elevate such a figure in a tone of admiration, while scorning the Christian faith, signals a disturbing set of values and priorities.

    For this reason, I will no longer support SmokingPipes.com and encourage others who value truth, historical integrity, and Christian witness to do the same. As Ephesians 5:11 exhorts us:

    “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”

    Sources:

    Crowley, The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, Arkana, 1989.

    Sutin, Do What Thou Wilt, St. Martin’s Press, 2000.

    Churton, Aleister Crowley: The Biography, Watkins, 2011.

    Kaczynski, Perdurabo, North Atlantic Books, 2010.

    28
    1
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • James Skok on April 6, 2025

      I dont agree with your perception of C&D, Smoking Pipes, or Laudisi Ent. romanticising Crowley, the occult, devil worship, or satanist, etc. I am. not as educated as you, but I do keep an open mind on most matters and enjoy debating. What I object to is secular politics or thought obliterating COMMON SENSE. THE BEAST is a lark. Smoking Pipes is not a den of evil doers. It is a den of PIPE SMOKERS. As for Christian followings, why not list the suffering has been caused by so-called Christians; to wit the Inquisition, the destructive practices of missionaries perpetrated on the indigenous populations-Hawaii, the Eskimos and Intuits, Africa.
      So, stop clutching your pearls, untwist your panties and LIGHTEN UP, RELAX and enjoy yourself. If you dont like what you see you needn’t stare at it. Next thing you’re going to come up with is your rejection of Darwin. REMEMBER the Catholic Church locked up Galileo and imprisoned Marco Polo. OH! By the way, you dont have to be a Catholic to like FATHER DEMPSEY.

      1
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Ham Solo on March 31, 2025

    Holy CRAP C&D! What in the WORLD are you thinking glorifying someone like this?

    28
    1
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • James F. on March 31, 2025

    Incredibly bad choice made here. C&D and SmokingPipes.com, you have chosen to spurn a large portion of your audience in a very small market. It's a choice, but gee willikers. You've lost my business.

    22
    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Brandon R. on March 31, 2025

    Well this is sad news for me to hear today. I had no idea Laudisi Enterprises, Inc would promote and celebrate such a satanic figure. I will now have to stop all purchases and uses of SmokingPipes.com, the blends and even Peterson pipes since Laudisi Enterprises, Inc owns all of that now. My family and friends will not support anything satanic like this. I pray the company sees the light, "Jesus", literally and turns from these wicked ways.

    .. as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord!

    -Brandon

    19
    3
    6
    Reply
    Cancel
    • SavinelliSali717 on March 31, 2025

      AMEN brother!!!

      10
      1
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Frank M. on March 31, 2025

      Well...bye

      3
      2
      7
      Reply
      Cancel
  • SavinelliSali717 on March 31, 2025

    Joshua 24:15
    And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

    13
    2
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Wtfiss on March 31, 2025

    WTF when is the Hitler blend coming out boys? SEEK GOD

    8
    3
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Kyle L. on March 31, 2025

    Why the extensive autobiographical write up? The written text on the tobacco seems to come second.

    6
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on March 31, 2025

      The impression given speaks far louder than their alleged intent.

      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

      I have no knowledge of the actual case here, but I allow for the possibility of a repurposed paper that had been researched beyond trade blog requirements. Again, not even speculation, really, just an allowance.

      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • David Zembo on March 31, 2025

    As a notorious Satanist of dubious reputation, Mr. Crow let’s is hardly a pipe smoker of interest to me, and I suspect as well for many other readers and pipe smokers. As a serious Traditional Catholic, it’s also offensive, and therefore impossible for me to read or embrace, especially on this Monday morning following the fourth Sunday of Lent.. Why would you honor such an evil persona with a new tobacco blend? This is a Bud-Lite moment for me.

    13
    1
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

      Crowley was not a Satanist. As a serious opponent of child exploitation, I am sure that you vocally oppose the Catholic Church's decades of coverups of child abuse. The Catholic Church has harmed thousands upon thousands of human lives. Aleister Crowley was a drunk pervert who died penniless and alone. Why you side with a massive evil and shame the smaller evil is confusing to me, but you have every right to do so. Happy piping!

      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Morris on March 31, 2025

    I find this offensive. To be honest. I will have to rethink purchasing C&D products and from Smoking Pipes itself. A self proclaimed satanist one who considered evil a good thing, is not ro be celebrated.

    16
    1
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Frank M. on March 31, 2025

      More for me, hail satan

      8
      10
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Scott F. on March 31, 2025

    Crowley died 1 December 1947. He spent his final days sequestered in a single room in a boarding house in Hastings. Impoverished and bed-ridden, reportedly living off his “followers” and royalties from his writing, his legacy is that of a “hedonistic egomaniac, bent on acquiring power over others and addicted to sex and a multitude of mind-altering drugs.” So reprehensible was the man that his hometown forbade his being cremated within their boundaries. His death certificate gave the cause of death as: “1a Myocardial degeneration; II Chronic bronchitis; Chronic Heroin Addict”.

    Good job C&D.

    10
    1
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Benjamin F. on March 31, 2025

    As far as the eye can see, a vast field of bunched panties churns with discomfiture.

    It’ll be okay, folks. I promise.

    9
    5
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

      It will be okay. We just want folks to be on the joyful side of the reckoning. (Got the old-school going today and need to find a foot-pump prairie organ. "On a hill... far away...")

      3
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

        How can there be a joyful side of the reckoning if all the folks on the other side of the reckoning are just as human and red-blooded as everyone else? That's something I never understand. The world is surely wicked, but I can never bring myself to giggle with impish glee and delight at the thought of others burning in damnation. Though certainly not an issue which can be solved in comment section, haha. Happy piping!

        2
      • Douglas F. on April 9, 2025

        @Lucas S. You asked a question that is not just fair and legitimate, but really essential. I've been late in replying but want to give it a shot here.

        Part of your question is easy to answer, and part isn't.

        The plain part is that even the best, most cheerful, industrious and solid people we know do not deserve to spend eternity with God, a.k.a. "the Most High." Human virtue, even at its best, doesn't meet that standard, which is of an entirely different class.

        What that standard is, and how it works in God's mind, is always a bit of a mystery, which is part of the faith that is required. We have a strong, natural human opposition to the idea of being judged from on high (Christopher Hitchens was eloquent here), and that is the big hurdle. Some clear it, and some don't. I am beginning to think that even the ability to clear that hurdle might be negotiated somehow, in that if we take one step toward God, He might then grant us a little more understanding to take the next. ("He rewards those who seek Him.") But this is getting into nuanced theology and is beyond my confidence to state as advice. But if you want to test the theory, you could always just take a step and see if anything develops. My recent return to the faith has brought strong affirmation from little effort. That's because "little effort" is the most I've managed in 30 years, so it counts. God wants us to succeed, which is the part that gets missed and shouted over. He has literal skin in the game. Which brings me to...

        God's justice is where we find the need for Christ and the perfect sacrifice that He made by taking on the collective guilt of humanity after coming to Earth and managing to live a life that was perfect in the eyes of God. That last part is important, because if Christ had also come up short, then the punishment would have been individually deserved instead of being a divine credit that Jesus could then give to us. This forgiveness does work as an actual transferrable credit, because God the Father (one of the Trinity) does not forgive sin without punishment. This, again, is a mysterious requirement to us, which I frame abstractly as "Divine metaphysics" as I back away from the question. At any rate, God's is THE top-level cosmic justice, and I don't even set the rules down here.

        A quick note here that although we (understandably) talk a lot about punishment and Hell, there also is a strong affirmative argument for Christian faith having to do with a sense of peace, clarity of purpose, the joy of community (if you find a good one), and the satisfaction of earthly work that gets good things done. A good church supports all this. Not all churches are good, and the bad ones get all the coverage, so it can be hard to spot until you get out there and start checking them out for yourself. Even then, it's trial and error. But they are out there, feeding people and building stuff and knitting sweaters, visiting people in the hospital, helping with filings, etc.

        The positive shift that I just made speaks to the second part of your question, which is how Christians could be joyful when others have been lost. We certainly should not be joyful here on earth; it's a profound tragedy that any should miss the grace afforded by Christ, especially since He also made it so ridiculously simple to cash in: You admit to God that you need it, you accept it, and you ask Him to show you the path forward. Then you are in a whole new time zone, and the Holy Spirit starts showing up to feed your conscience and help you avoid pitfalls. (The arrival of the Holy Spirit is celebrated on the Christian day of Pentecost, which follows Easter. At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples to empower them for the first mission field work -- gave them languages and such.)

        But again: There is no schadenfreude at the foot of the Cross. Anyone sneaking it in will answer for it; it is blasphemy.

        But what will be our perspective on the lost once we are with Him? Friends and family, people we loved and admired in our human lives? Will we mourn? Will we cheer? Will we shrug? I have no idea, but part of my faith is that the right perspective will be given to me when it is needed. (I'm also hoping there is not social status in Heaven, because wouldn't that just be fun. Unless I'm also given that correct perspective, I mean. Either way, it's Heaven, so I won't complain too much. But yeah, I might be in the back washing dishes. Joyfully, though.)

        Much of it comes down to the simple clash between our own sense of fairness and God's unassailable sense of justice. His creation, His rules. Fortunately, that justice comes with the most powerful sentence commutation of all time, found in the real-deal, bled-for-it sacrifice that Christ made on our behalf, and in the bank of forgiveness that He has been authorized to distribute. The only catch is that we need to expressly choose that grace, which is why the spirit of darkness tries to make that radically simple choice so impossibly difficult. That camp also is recruiting, and heavily.

        This, finally, goes back to the thought that we don't need Crowley flitting about to muddy the water with Thelema and "do what you will" and whatnot. There's noise everywhere, as I know from having just spent 30 years on a spiritual walkabout that, by God's grace, has led me right back home. (Yes, it is cheesy. But it's joyful cheese.)

        1
  • Gary S. on March 31, 2025

    I'm calling a failed April Fools joke.

    1
    1
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Matt S. on March 31, 2025

    All you youth pastors whining and crying about things that are just as much make believe as all-seeing sky daddy and zombie Jesus sure have given me a good chuckle! Very excited to try The Beast.

    7
    14
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on March 31, 2025

      May it bring you a scrap of originality.

      3
      2
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Greybeard on April 1, 2025

        Yeah, "sky daddy".....so original; if only the army of angry atheist NPC's hadn't said that a million times before him.

        3
        2
    • Randal W. on April 2, 2025

      The religion of atheism is interesting to me. Devoutly believing in unbelief

      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Frank M. on March 31, 2025

    I'm loving this comment section. Hail Satan and hail C&D!

    5
    2
    13
    Reply
    Cancel
  • ☘️🥃 on March 31, 2025

    I don't know how many people remember or ever heard of the serial killer Richard Ramirez, aka the night stalker. He also blurbed out " Hail Satan" in court as he was being escorted off to prison. https://youtu.be/AQ2L3EcLy1Q?feature=shared. Align your money with your values 🇺🇲🦅🐘

    3
    2
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

      I don't know many people remember or ever heard of the serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, aka the Milwaukee Cannibal. He also blurbed out that he was a "follower of Jesus" after he was escorted off to prison. Align your money with your values. 🤡🤡🤡

      1
      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • ☘️🥃 on April 4, 2025

        @lucas; Not spending my money on anything that endorses or glorifies Jeffrey Dahmer, dum dum. Don't be such a moron. No more contending with the ox or donkey.

  • richnewman on March 31, 2025

    I see the Christo-fascist crowd is out in force! Boo hoo, there's a tobacco based on a blend smoked by an esoteric Englishman... Here's an idea: Don't buy any and let the rest of us have it! I mean, don't upset your Magic Sky Fairy by smoking Devil Tobacco!

    6
    1
    13
    Reply
    Cancel
    • mtvernon on March 31, 2025

      Whenever I see someone say fascist these days it’s like a dog whistle that almost always serves only to reveal that person’s ignorance. Here’s yet another example. And he isn’t really remembered as an “esoteric Englishman”. It’s disingenuous at best to think that’s at the heart of this.

      9
      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • richnewman on April 1, 2025

        Is Christo-ignoramous a better term? I mean, there's lots for Evangelicals: White Nationalist, hatemongers, closed minded bigots, etc. Which do you prefer?

        1
        7
  • Molda on March 31, 2025

    https://youtu.be/g9M7VRgyEZQ?feature=shared

    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • mtvernon on March 31, 2025

    My first purchase here was in January 2016. Since then I’ve earned about 14 badges and spent thousands of dollars happily because I believe in what Mr. Wilford & company did and is doing. Others have been here longer and are even more established, so I don’t say that to brag at all. I’m just establishing my bona fides leading to this comment.

    I think this was a foolish and hazardous article (and blend) to put out. It’s an unforced error both personally and commercially, especially post-Bud Light/Target. Pro or against, it has now obviously ignited something unprecedented in the nine years since I came here: polarizing controversy. As a loyal customer who would very much like to stay that way, I’m very, very interested in what Laudisi/Smoking Pipes/ Sykes’ next move will be to address this in the next week or so.

    We all are grateful for the wise, thoughtful choices they’ve made over the years. Laudisi carefully and diligently curated a huge niche and built their great global reputation the old fashioned way, through hard work and integrity. I’d hate for this company to burn all the good will and trust it has earned and kept for so long.

    I hope this is a bump in the road and a lesson learned. If nothing is said, I’ll be sad to say goodbye to all this, but companies have choices and so do customers.

    15
    1
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Michael Hughes on April 1, 2025

    This is wonderful, can’t wait to try it. And I’m amused by all the animosity in the comments—comparing Crowley to Stalin, calling him a satanist, etc. Learn to read before you make such silly comments, and grow up would be my suggestions. Or perhaps just point to the puppet to show us where Uncle Al hurt you.

    Not everyone is a fundamentalist Christian and afraid the Big Bad Devil is just waiting to drag us to hell. Some of us enjoy reading Crowley, flaws and all, and appreciate that a premier tobacco blender finds his story fascinating and worthy of a potent blend. Kudos, C&D, and don’t let the crazies influence your provocative choices.

    4
    9
    Reply
    Cancel
    • David H on April 1, 2025

      Didnt he eat his own sh*t?

      2
      2
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jakob K. on April 1, 2025

        They call that "progress" these days!

        1
        3
    • James Skok on April 6, 2025

      I am, have been and will continue to be a customer of Smoking Pipes et al. regardless of all the hub-bub I have been reading in the comments. At the risk of incurring the wrath of all the fundamentalist bible thumpers…MY GOD! Get over yourselves. STOP PREACHING about all this sinning going on at Smoking Pipes. If you want to pray, go on and pray, but please refrain from praying at me. I am all for silent prayer.
      OH…and let us NOT make a mountain out of a mole hill.

      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Seth on April 1, 2025

    I will no longer patronize Smoking Pipes.

    10
    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Basil212 on April 1, 2025

    It's pretty sick that you guys released this during lent with Holy Week and Easter approaching in a few weeks. Seems intentional, especially with this write up, not to mention all of the controversy in the news at the moment. Sorry Laudisi, I'm a Catholic and you've lost my business.

    15
    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Brook D. on April 1, 2025

    As a Catholic, this really makes me question my support for Laudisi...

    12
    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Strangelove on April 1, 2025

    It's ridiculous how many Christians think that just because a few of their religious idols like Tolkien, Lewis, or whatever pseudo-religious youtube piper were/are also into this hobby, that the entirety of this community is aligned with them. Plenty of none-religious people smoke and don't give a shit, and thinking Christians are somehow the majority of pipe smokes and must be constantly catered to is absolutely asinine.

    Imagine whining over a decade old, small batch blend, that the vast majority of smokers aren't going to get in the first place. Truly, no one other than the religious, would think that nothing but a short, biography of a terrible person, equates into glorification of that person's beliefs, but that again, I guess there is historical precedence for you people considering education to be evil.

    Please, buy nothing but Presbyterian, and leave the rest of us alone, without your obtuse grandstanding.

    6
    11
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

      We do understand that not everyone is aligned with us, but the default mode of Christianity is testimony, not silence. And it's not so surprising that the traditionalist appeal of piping would sometimes overlap with traditional attitudes about religion. I'm not looking to be catered to as much as I am looking not to be tagged by a wild pitch. Sometimes you choose to speak up; sometimes you need to.

      7
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jakob K. on April 1, 2025

        @Strangelove Your irrational hatred of Christians is irrelevant to our rightfully taking issue with a company using a nasty and virulently hateful man as "inspiration".

        7
        3
      • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

        @Strangelove I don't see the reply link on your post, so I'll have to reply to myself here, and this response won't be in order.

        The hypocrisy you spot is inarguable, and it is the Church's big failing. The end of a ladle is exactly where we should be. People even know to look for us there, for literal Christ's sake.

        I've only recently come back to the faith after a 30-year spiritual walkabout, so I'm relearning this myself, with emphasis on the authentic, even mystical, experience of Christ, not the facile, mis-institutionalized version that has become busybody, strident, and alienating. But I do know that out there beyond the circus is a place of peace and clarity. The Church I have found (Episcopal) shows every sign of orienting to that ground, so I am praying for a late harvest of good, honest work.

        Our testimony should be that of Christ's love, not man's judgment. That often gets tangled at the point of application, especially on points of culture that are always somewhat abstract and prone to oversimplification.

        "Leave the rest of us alone" is a common sentiment, but some of us who want to register an alternate point of view are not trying to vex others as much as we are trying to explain the significance that we see in the issue. A great many do, however, weaponize their "-ianity" in ways that are deeply harmful all around. It's in the papers and at school board meetings every day. (And I live in Oklahoma, which is a hot zone for this.)

        To the extent that Laudisi is a private business, they will know that I spent $1,958.42 with them over the past year. If I need to pay a cover charge to express a viewpoint, that should suffice. I'm not going to shake my fist and stomp off, but I will add a loyal customer vote for less Crowley. (While I'm at it, maybe they also could acquire the rights to War Horse, which is my nomination for the Official Smoke of the End Times.)

        Peace also to you -- which is a universally good parting word and always welcome.

        10
      • Strangelove on April 1, 2025

        Good for you that you lot feel compelled to wag you finger at all "others" that exist, doesn't make the whole thing any less silly. And what nonsense this is, testimony over silence? Let's pull up the list of people excommunicated, killed, or exiled by Christians, and see how many stood by in silence when suffering was meted out by the Cross, or are they "not true Christians", and thus not indicative of what a """real""" Christian would do?

        The Beast blend first launched around 2016, and again in, I believe 2021, 2023, and now 2025, and every time it was released, it was around March/April. Here we are with the FOURTH launch of it, and every damn time, Christians just HAV to speak up about Godless leadership leadership, Heathens or that, and blah blah blah. If your idea of testimony is complaining that a PRIVATE BUSINESS is not in line with your PERSONAL beliefs, more power to you.

        Christians cant stop molesting children, agree on a single denomination, or actually help the poor and downtrodden unless they convert, but boy howdy can they look down from their high horse over a tobacco, that's the real problem. Maybe log off and grab a ladle, you know actually do something Christ-like, unless being offended on His behalf is is better use of your time.

        Maybe this whole sect could be taken seriously if there wasn't this constant grandstanding about all the problem in the whole damn world, when the House of God is constantly in a poor and hypocritical state of affairs. There's like half a dozen Small Batch blends, smoke those and leave the rest of us alone. Peace.

        4
        8
    • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

      We do understand that not everyone is aligned with us, but the default mode of Christianity is testimony, not silence. And it's not so surprising that the traditionalist appeal of piping would sometimes overlap with traditional attitudes about religion. I'm not looking to be catered to as much as I am looking not to be tagged by a wild pitch. Sometimes you choose to speak up; sometimes you need to.

      9
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jakob K. on April 1, 2025

        Quite right. I have absolutely no need for C&D to get preachy or pandering instead of this--they simply need to provide tobacco without enthusiastically enabling people like Mr. Kiser to wax oddly poetic about wicked men in order to sell an "edgy" blend. Silly adolescent behavior at best, ominous at worst. My money is better spent elsewhere either way.

        9
        3
  • Mac S. on April 1, 2025

    I’m absolutely disgusted with this and will never support SmokingPipes again. I refuse to give my money to an enterprise that celebrates such vile people and sickening rat filth.

    6
    4
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • 🌲🌳🌄🌤️🗻 on April 1, 2025

    Bob Ross would've been a better portrait of a human being🎨🖌️🖼️ Jesus...

    1
    5
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

      I am totally down for a "Happy Accident" blend. We dip the leaves into a maple wash and then "slap the devil out of them" on the leg of the easel, papabapbap.

      2
      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Lazarus on April 1, 2025

    You are missing some information. Crowley also wrote about intercourse with minors because he believed it gave him power. Please update the article.

    7
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Douglas F. on April 1, 2025

    For a little day-two perspective, some are wondering "Why are these wiggy people losing it over one small-batch tobacco release?" It's a good question, and some of the answer comes from the larger religious context.

    Christians generally see the world in big-picture, long-timeline context, as an ongoing contest between God's Kingdom and the Kingdom of Satan (though I often prefer the descriptive term "Kingdom of Darkness"). That contest plays out across all aspects of daily life -- from federal policy, to the stinky guy asking you for a couple of bucks, right down to the barrage of web ads and billboards. All of it together is trying to *align our consciousness with one kingdom or the other* -- either by stirring our desires or by desensitizing us to greed, vengeance, debauchery, etc. If you can be swayed on one small point, that's one more loop of Velcro that they have secured. Not big by itself, but aligned with a larger purpose that has everything to do with the final shape of our being.

    When the general state of the world gets heightened and confused, it is an indication that a big shift in the battle is happening, and Christians take note. This sharpens our attention across the board -- and, in my case, it has just returned me to the faith itself. (God will have your back for 30 wandering years if He chooses to, which is why I'm being so outspoken now; I've lost some time and have received unreal grace.) It is something like the body's immune response; when a pathogen is on the move, it's all hands on deck.

    So in one sense, yes, this is just one small-batch tobacco release. But to a Christian on alert, it can look more like one small rivet on a locomotive that is steaming nowhere good. A sign of the times.

    13
    1
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Gabriel R. on April 1, 2025

    This was a major misstep for Laudisi. The blend is not the point or the issue. The problem is that Laudisi is advocating for a truly terrible human being and failed to take onto account how that would offend so many of their customers. Isn’t it enough that our hobby is persecuted and taxed into oblivion just about everywhere? Isn’t it enough that beloved companies and blends are disappearing left and right? Laudisi should focus on what unites us as a community and advocating for it, not sponsoring a massive divide amongst us.

    11
    1
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • James Marc R. on April 1, 2025

    Laudisi is releasing an occult-inspired tobacco blend and celebrating a Godless man who munched on his own feces and rejected God, during Lent?! Have you lost your minds?! This is DETESTABLE!

    Extremely bad form. Retract it. If this is purposeful; that is to say that godless 'leadership' at Laudisi, wishing to displace Christ's resurrection and bringing about the new covenant for man, purposefully released this at this time... you have lost my business. I cannot do business with companies which celebrate Satanists.

    16
    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Anthony M. on April 1, 2025

    Definitely buying this blend. Don't cant wait! Sounds super intense. Love how butt hurt the community can be. No body whines and complains to other blends that lean towards Christian or Catholic views. Personally Father Dempsey is one of my favorite blends. And I'm sure I'll love The Beast as well. Smoke up friends. Stop being so narrow minded.

    4
    10
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Clint A. on April 1, 2025

      Disliking a pedo is narrow minded? WTF is wrong with you?

      6
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • StamperTamper on April 1, 2025

    The reality is no one knows what happens when we die, but one thing I know for sure is Christians invented cancel culture. You know? The whole banishing of two people who ate a freaking apple. They just can’t take it when the tide turns on them. Smoke away you devil dogs 🤟

    6
    8
    Reply
    Cancel
    • richnewman on April 1, 2025

      The religious fanatics in here are ridiculous. Complaining about a tobacco they DON'T HAVE TO BUY and have the nerve to call others "snowflake." You're right, nobody does cancel culture like right wing Evangelicals...

      4
      6
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        Is our voice limited to the "Pay Now" button? Does a segment of loyal customers have any claim on what the vendor shows them in the first place?

        In the sense that coming to the site is an experience and part of the customer relationship, I see room for that argument. Of course, the argument also should recognize the importance of consumer choice for all users, and this is where the friction happens.

        Now, is the choice value centered on what's in the can, or is the marketing part of the value? Would some tactful, valid rebranding be a net positive for SP customers as a whole, or does it have to be win/lose on the whole package as-is?

        I am not interested in notching a Christian-soldier "win," but in having a less rudely tone-deaf SP experience. It looks like there are enough of us to raise the point, especially since we can make ourselves a declining customer segment if we need to.

        2
        1
    • James Marc R. on April 1, 2025

      Yes we do... God tells us. Everyone has fallen short of the glory of God. But the righteousness of God is revealed through faith and trust. God has revealed Himself manifestly, clearly and continuously, in such clear terms that EVERYONE gets the message. God's law has been planted on your heart. YOU may appear to reject the benefit of sacred scripture and/or attempt to corrupt it, but even you can't escape it. God doesn't wait for you to be acceptable, having faith in sanctification makes you acceptable.

      5
      3
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        OK, wow, I'm glad out of the whole range of gods and religions around the world you found the only real one AND that god has made you intolerant of anyone who believes in a different god or spiritual system. Bravo. Congratulations on having all of the answers!

        2
        4
      • Stamper Tamper on April 1, 2025

        Well….I may have to explain my position to Saint Peter if I see him, but I’ll make you a deal. When you come back from the pearly gates with undeniable proof I’ll convert right away. Cheers!

        5
        1
        8
    • mtvernon on April 1, 2025

      Well…Adam and Eve existed before Christianity, so…yeah.

      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Redacted on April 1, 2025

      This comment has been deleted.

      • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

        Well, your user name sure is accurate! 😂

        1
        1
        1
      • richnewman on April 1, 2025

        Aren't you the ones always complaining about cancel culture? How'd that Bud Light boycott go? Spare us. It's clear who the "snowflakes" are in these comments...

        2
        4
  • Andrés F. on April 1, 2025

    Well it’s the time for something new… I hope I can snatched a couple of tins and not miss out this year.

    5
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • 🎨🖌️🖼️ on April 1, 2025

    $18.49, that's amusing...

    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

    Good Lord, what a silly response to a product launch!

    First, "occult" means hidden. That's it. Not "satanic" or anything to do with Old Scratch, aka the Big Bad Devil. There are Christians who are occultists—in fact, most occultists in the Middle Ages and Renaissance were Christians, because they were the only ones who could afford and read occult texts.

    Much occultism is based on Jewish Kabbalah and esoteric Christianity. Don't believe me? Read some books.

    It's bizarre that there's such intolerance to occultism, but as we can see here in this forum, it's based on very limited understanding of what occultism is, and lots of misinformation and sensationalism.

    I'm an occultist. I have written books on occultism. I also admire the life of Christ and practice his teachings on tolerance and love. I have Christian friends, pagan friends, Buddhist friends, atheist friends, Hindu friends, and agnostic friends. Maybe consider that 1. Not everyone is a Christian, 2. Not every Christian is a fundamentalist, 3. Not every Christian is afraid of a bogeyman who has been dead for a very long time.

    Seriously, y'all, it's a tobacco blend. No one is forcing you to smoke it. Your soul is safe even if you do—it's just blended and processed leaves, not a purloined eucharistic host dipped in the blood of unbaptized babies.

    This is the 21st century. If you want to live as if it's the Middle Ages and demons and witches are lurking around every corner waiting to snatch your soul, well, that's your choice. But the rest of us can enjoy a blend named after a notorious character without losing our minds about it and acting as if Lucifer is popping out of every tin to possess the unwary smoker of its contents.

    Lighten up. Don't like it? Cool. Wanna boycott C&D? That's your right—you guys are fans of free market capitalism, right?

    I'll buy a few extra tins, light some black candles, invite my pet goat, Black Philip, in for the fun, and summon some demons to enjoy the room note. And you're welcome to come over, we don't bite (though the tobacco might nibble on your tongue).

    6
    1
    4
    Reply
    Cancel
    • James Skok on April 6, 2025

      I have been trying to make some comments about the comments, but you sum up my thinking precisely. I am a bit exasperated by the evangelicals arguing theirs is the only valid viewpoint. Laudisi Ent isn’t advocating anything more than trying to sell tobacco. I dont think Ive ever seen such a group of pearlclutching, panties in a twist, tongue clickers before. If this bunch wants to debate or rail against something, there is plenty to see going wrong of real import in the world instead of dredging up the approval rating of a long dead and entitled societal reject that was Crowley. These people would be at home railing against Charles Darwin. In fact, I wouldn’t doubt some of their antecedents were with William Jennings Bryan at the Scopes Monkey Trial.

      2
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 7, 2025

        First, those of us who were offended did not dredge up anything, but were presented with Crowley when we came to the site. Even if our offense can be criticized, it would not need to be, had it not been caused first. (The self-inflictedness here is part of the error.)

        Consider, also, that our offense could be grounded in the actual substance of faith. Some comments here shed light on this. This matters to some of us because of the viewpoint and behavior showcased by the release. It's not so odd when you remember that some people religiously avoid ham. (You can decide whether that also is pearl-clutching. I recognize it as answering a particular call to righteousness. I also happen to be avoiding pork and beef right now during Lent. That restriction has little to do with what's on the fork, but much to do with how I experience my own desires and impatience during a time of reflection.)

        Second, the marketing angle that qualifies Crowley as an inspiration for a blend also qualifies for customer comment. Our sensibilities as buyers of tobacco pertain directly to the choices of sellers of tobacco. We can't reduce this to a paper transaction just to avoid the controversy; it's knowingly built into the marketing here.

        Third, standing by one's viewpoint is not the same as claiming it is the only valid option. (This argument is fallacious and common.) It is a sly move to conjure fault from the other side's commitment to its own position. But all of that aside: If someone takes offense at our offense, it only underscores the point that this was a divisive release and a messy way to promote the blend.

        2
  • Clint A. on April 1, 2025

    There is no such book called, The Book of Revelations. Also who cares about an occultist? Trash "small batch" for trash people. Smoke on!

    2
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
    • MichaelMHughes on April 1, 2025

      Nice to know that you consider anyone who doesn't share your narrow religious views "trash." I thought Jesus taught love and tolerance? Guess I read the wrong New Testament.

      3
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • James Marc R. on April 2, 2025

        You thought wrong.

        "I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Jesus

        Did you think Jesus was about creating Mr. Rogers' neighborhood? Tolerance is for the wicked... God doesn't 'tolerate'. It's His way or nothing.

        5
        2
  • Matthew W. on April 1, 2025

    Not trying to nitpick, but it's called the book of "Revelation," not the book of "Revelations."

    3
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • PD on April 1, 2025

    146 posts and counting. This is the most popular arcticle in SmokingPipes.com "history" !! Congratulations to everyone who participated!

    And thanks to Laudisi for revitalizing the pipes and tobacco industry.

    3
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on April 2, 2025

      If only the majority of likes and comments weren't from loss of future revenue!

      How many tins of Pædo's Perique at $18.49 offset the future absence of a lifetime of orders of 7 tins of various G.L. Pease or 3 tins of From Beyond or 5 tins of various C&D...anyone wanna crunch the numbers?

      4
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        Well, I am sitting out for the next 90 days. Based on my past 12 months of purchases, this will be about $630 in absent second-quarter revenue.

        3
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        That's 34 cans of Crowley.

        1
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        That's 34 cans of Crowley.

  • Jebediah S on April 1, 2025

    Praying you all follow through with the C&D boycott 🙏🏾
    Maybe I can finally score some Sun Bear.

    4
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • 🦇🌕🐺 American Werewolf...in America on April 1, 2025

      Nah, read and translate the first comment. You'll still have to compete with that.

      Reply
      Cancel
  • George S. on April 1, 2025

    After running all 153 comments through an AI app that seeks consensus, the algorithm recommended rebranding this blend as “Witch’s Tit.” I don’t even know what that means. Keep in mind that Michael’s multiple comments may have screwed the data. If I take Michael’s comments out, recommended rebrand is “Witch Pricker.”
    Not sure what that means either. Ok. See all you friends at the pipe shows! Remember you can choose your pipe, but you can’t choose your pipe family. Tied together in our love for the hobby. May you find peace, health, happiness, and good fortune until the next “meeting”.

    2
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • 🥃🎅👍🏻 on April 2, 2025

      Isn't AI great! I didn't understand 🍺🎅🏿👍's comment "Thanks, I will!!👍👍
      Enjoy your butthurt !
      🍆💦" So, I ran it through an AI app. and it responded with a mom joke: That's what I told your mom your mom last night when we cowboyed up🤠🏇🐎" AI is evolving and seems to be developing a sense of humor🥒💦

      1
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Chris H. on April 2, 2025

    Well, smokingpipes.com just lost a customer. I will not support this or a site that promotes it. Period.

    3
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Pipin'Hot on April 2, 2025

    Great article, and great idea for a blend! I am quite amused at the comments from the "triggered pipers", acting as if they only smoke tobacco made by the pope himself. Buy this just to spite them?

    2
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • 🥞 Flip-flopped Flapjacks on April 2, 2025

    Been a customer since 2013. I flip-flopped because they flip-flopped on me. There are other vendors. Enjoy your muzzles...and increasing prices. For peace of mind, this flip-flopper will fly solo.

    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • F. Taylor on April 2, 2025

    Please . . . release a Bundy Blend, or a Gacy tribute with clown artwork on the label. Perhaps even an anonymous Zodiac blend . . .

    3
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Friendly Piper on April 2, 2025

      In a fairly grim comments thread, this one made me chuckle for its creativity and the clear mental image. Well played!

      Reply
      Cancel
    • Jakob K. on April 2, 2025

      I'm just waiting for the same flippant responses from C&D, and the very hip, very edgy adolescents defending them here, when some Jewish smokers complain about the "Final Solution" Stoved Cavendish Small Batch.

      2
      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

        Oh, come now, the Shoah? Crowley was a sacrilegious, drug-addled pervert who wrote maybe one decent book on yoga out of a mountain of gobbledygook, but he didn't attempt to eradicate anyone. Well, other than his own followers, perhaps, hahaha

        1
        2
  • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

    I have been active in these comments, and I have mostly tried to be plainly old-school Christian while avoiding strident outrage. I always knew that the product release was coming, but now that it is out, I feel the need to observe a 90-day blackout on SP purchases. So no second-quarter revenue from me. Laudisi had significant capital expenditure last year and is most likely servicing debt; a disciplined blackout 4/1 to 6/30 could make the point stick in a language they understand. Don’t provoke customers who are at the height of their Lenten discipline; we can just extend the abstinence. Now through June 30, I’m ghost — not a shrill reaction, but a measured response.

    (Tech note: Not all Christians observe Lent, so no one needs to argue that ancillary point.)

    6
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jerry G. on April 2, 2025

      Sorry, put this on the wrong comment 🙄
      I can get behind this. It is a well thought-out, measured response instead of a knee-jerk hysterical reaction that can be easily ignored. Whether it was poor judgement, blind ignorance or willful antagonism on SP’s part, if enough people would follow this $$ example, perhaps a second thought would take place next time. I will follow suit. Happy Piping to you all. Looking forward to celebrating the reason for my hope in a couple of weeks!

      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • ☘️🥃 on April 2, 2025

      I'm not Catholic, but brought up Christian and read and practice other disciplines of wisdom. It was bad taste to release this at this time of year. Why not Halloween? Over 12yrs of spending my hard earned money here, and they could care less about offending or if you take your business elsewhere. There's a certain vibe or undertone that has made it's presence felt😶🇷🇺🇨🇳 💲💲💲

      5
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Jerry G. on April 2, 2025

        I can get behind this. It is a well thought-out, measured response instead of a knee-jerk hysterical reaction that can be easily ignored. Whether it was poor judgement, blind ignorance or willful antagonism on SP’s part, if enough people would follow this $$ example, perhaps a second thought would take place next time. I will follow suit. Happy Piping to you all. Looking forward to celebrating the reason for my hope in a couple of weeks!

        1
    • Friendly Piper on April 2, 2025

      While I’m not offended by the release (though I am offended by the tin note!), this is the sort of calm, clear statement of conviction I truly respect.

      5
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

        Thank you. I had no intention to pull my business, but when I saw the banner promo this morning, I understood that my response needed a material component. Blog comments can be ignored, but revenue speaks. I am encouraged that this does not feel like petulance to me, but like fair play on a field that comes down to business. Thanks again for your good word.

        6
  • Friendly Piper on April 2, 2025

    Since I’m Friendly, I won’t get into the controversy other than to say that some of the comments about Laudisi employees’ appearances are gratuitous and undermine the supposedly Christ-based nature of the complaints. We should all be a lot kinder. That doesn’t mean backing down from your beliefs! It just means behaving in a way that amplifies them.

    In that spirit of kindness, I’d recommend that we all consider voting with our dollars for blends we enjoy. If that means choosing solely based on flavor, Laudisi has hundreds from which we can choose: C&D; 4th Generation’s Fathers, Friends, and Fire; Drucquer; Nording (I really enjoyed these); Pease; Two Friends; and more.

    And for those who choose their blends based on more than that—including the name, tin art, and backstory—there are some great choices here, too. First Responders, the Black Servicemen series (Montfort Point Marine, Tuskegee Airman, and USS Mason all are terrific), and the Hebraica series (I met Rabbi Ira Stone at the Morley Pipe Club in Philadelphia last year and he had some great stories about those).

    Another constructive suggestion might be to think of some themes that would be appealing to you. I was raised in a different faith but have a great appreciation of the Gospels and would be happy with blends that celebrate Faith, Hope, and Love—but keep in mind that Paul told us “the greatest of these is Love.”

    Christian or not, we in the pipe smoking community would do well to keep that in mind.

    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on April 2, 2025

      Most of us who have a problem with this "inspiration" for a blend were already purchasing blends we like. I have enjoyed every C&D-produced blend I've tried to date and have several more cellaring; hence the weight of my voting with an absence of future purchases; hence why it is sad to see a company I admired stooping to such at best sophomoric and at worst disturbing levels. Like so many foolish ventures it is unnecessary and the doubling-down is just dumb. There are plenty of tastefully spooky avenues for branding a "beastly" blend--publishing Mr. Kiser's lengthy biography of Crowley, calling him an "inspiration" in the exact same sentence that tries to disclaim him as "wicked", right before Easter, is either foolish or malicious. And the little boys who still haven't gotten over their mothers grounding them for backtalking during Sunday School in the 1970s should ask themselves where they draw their own lines on consumer decisions and whether they're being a little bit hypocritical...if they're capable of such self-reflection.

      2
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Skip R. on April 2, 2025

    In light of the controversy that has arisen about this latest tobacco blend, I find it interesting that Laudis has not responded in any to the concerns of many of it's customers. I can only surmise that they do not care what concerns customers have, and are happy with the noteriety it has brought them, which may mean more sales. Their silence speaks volumes.

    4
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Joshua S. on April 2, 2025

    I am absolutely elated to see that Laudisi isn't giving a single inch to the all the whining from the single largest demographic of pipe-smokers about how their beliefs and preferences aren't being sufficiently catered to. Once there's even a hint of something that runs counter to Xtianty, the Xtians act like they've been thrown in the lions' den. And this despite the numerous examples of marketing that appeals directly to their religious leanings. "Good for me, not for thee" - happens every time. Bunch of crybabies. Laudisi's doing the right thing by letting them cry it out.

    1
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 2, 2025

      A lot depends on whether you roll this situation up into the general abstract idea of "the culture war" or whether you try to imagine the stunned disappointment of #### real customers. The hostility in your comment suggests that you are attaching this to a pre-existing narrative. (We all do this, which is the source of much of our aggravation.)

      4
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Joshua S. on April 3, 2025

        it's a pre-existing narrative because the phenomenon is inevitably repeated over and over again. i do appreciate your perspective, though.

        1
        2
    • Jakob K. on April 2, 2025

      We were all quite pleased to purchase from C&D without any explicit pandering on their part (unless you're going to count The Merry Monk or something?), but we take serious issue with their shining such a spotlight on an evil man who virulently opposed the Christian faith. How dare we have a problem with that, you ask? We dare, regardless of the tantrum you're still throwing mentally over once being told what to do and what not to do as a child, because this world and culture is opposed to Christ and when that fact rears its ugly head, we react. It's clear you'd have a hissy fit about the mere existence of Christians regardless, so why waste the time to write a comment displaying your silliness for all to see?

      3
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Joshua S. on April 3, 2025

        "WE *DARE* - but you're the one having a hissy fit." what a steretoypically solipsistic thing to say.

        i doubt jesus would be telling c&d to change their product marketing were he here among us now. your tobacco isn't a temple, he's not gonna be flipping over the tobacconist's tables because they demean his place of worship. i mean, i get that the whole, "smoking a pipe is my private 'going to church' experience" is real. but if someone's idea of "church" is satan, or ganesha, or the tao, they still get to participate. this idea that your particular subculture somehow has a possessive claim over the *overall* culture of pipe-smoking is just gross.

        you are not possessors, you are participants. and if satanists or whoever else want to participate, they have just as much of a right to as you do, and that includes being marketed to. you're only upset because you want to be in control, and this product is a stark reminder that you're not. jesus would tell you to get over what others do, instead of thinking of what you do yourself.

        and i do believe that would include depriving others of an earthly pleasure simply because they do not share your UNearthly ideas. he'd say, include the pagans. you're never gonna fulfill your part of building his kingdom on earth so long as you become offended at having to encounter the fact that there is yet a kingdom to be built.

        1
        2
      • Jakob K. on April 3, 2025

        @Joshua S. "I'm not a Christian but Jesus would want you to do what I want you to do"? Try again, little fella. :) The entire universe belongs to Christ the King.

        2
        2
  • 🇺🇲🦅🐘 on April 2, 2025

    Let's end this on a positive note. HAPPY LIBERATION DAY!!! Soaking my feet in The Gulf of America and sipping on some Buffalo Trace🥃 🐃 Smoking a Mayflower: Dawn. God is good, Cheers!

    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Grumpy on April 3, 2025

    Another example of the biased censorship. You'll allow the comments that assault the Christian faith to remain, but redact (delete) a snowflake comment. Very unAmerican and sad.

    2
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Richard J. on April 4, 2025

      You should let yourself cry.

      1
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Grumpy on April 5, 2025

        @Richard(dick) j: boy, I've been on 3 combat deployments for this country. I stepped up to serve in 1997 at the age of 24 and put myself in harms way for this country... patriots have died for it. Censorship is unAmerican, they should remove their GLPease 1st Amendment from the shelf. SP didn't use to censor. I won't quibble with a witless worm, you should change out that old moldy tuck kit your using before you get gangrene and your junk falls off. Get some meat in your diet, get outside more, take on a construction job, grow up and reclaim your testosterone if that's possible.

        1
        2
      • Richard J. on April 6, 2025

        Man Grumpy is real mad, and weirdly obsessed with male genitalia.

        1
        3
      • Richard J. on April 6, 2025

        The madder you get the funnier this is Grumpy.

        In my experience guys who have to tell you how "bad " they are, aren't.

        1
        2
  • Douglas F. on April 3, 2025

    Rebrand: C&D "After Dark." It's still creepy, and it's a clever nod to the label's controversial history. The title can be interpreted either way, that you are out after dark in the dark (exploring), or you are moving past the dark into light (heading home). You just rebrand on the controversy itself and let customers take it as they prefer. Cool art possibilities, too.

    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 3, 2025

      The art could be done in the C&D watercolor illustration style, which would take it down a notch and make it more reflective instead of disruptive.

      Reply
      Cancel
  • Richard J. on April 4, 2025

    The pearl clutching in this thread is absolutely hilarious. Bunch of superstitious snowflakes getting their little feel hurt.

    1
    4
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Douglas F. on April 4, 2025

      You have to be willing to step outside your standard-issue bubble of scorn and imagine how others try to live their values. Even if you think they have it wrong, you can recognize their desire to get it right. This is why, even though I'm a firm Christian, I am not a religious bigot, and I salute the instinct for righteousness wherever it appears.

      2
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Richard J. on April 4, 2025

        Thanks, Doug.

        2
        2
  • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

    Good grief! What a bunch of limpwristed, soyboy snowflakes, soiling their petticoats over words and letters! I'm taking a stand against censorship and the woke mob, just bought a tin this morning! I won't let the hypercommies boycott another great American company! If you hate freedom, go smoke your goofy girly aromatics in Russia!

    2
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Jakob K. on April 8, 2025

      Time for your meds, Grandpa.

      Reply
      Cancel
  • Gary S. on April 4, 2025

    How about a blend honoring Charlie Manson...call it Helter Skelter. That would be fun.

    1
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Lucas S. on April 4, 2025

      How about a blend honoring Andy Jackson...cal it Trail of Tears. That would be fun.

      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • James Skok on April 6, 2025

    I have read all of the comments and must say my piece. We’re talking about tobacco here; a tin of tobacco folks. Their is no satanic advocacy or praising the occult. The name of the tobacco was chosen to reflect the strength of the smoke not to conjure demons out of the smoke. I am flabbergasted so many of us pipe smokers cant take a joke at a time when we desperately need a bit of laughter.
    AND, to all of you who want to boycott don’t forget to cut your nose off to spite your face. This is the time to support Smoking Pipes when there are so many who would take that privilege from us.

    2
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Friendly Piper on April 6, 2025

      Probably worth noting that “Haddo’s Delight” also is Crowley-related (and for the same reason—the high Perique and rum). And those looking to boycott Laudisi may be deterred by Dan Tobacco’s “Devil’s Holiday.”

      So maybe we end up with Kopp? But if naming a blend after a villain is verböten, the pirate series over there is a problem because those guys raped and pillaged and enslaved.

      So I guess the principled among us are down to Gawith Hoggarth and Samuel Gawith.

      As for me, I’m going to smoke from all the manufacturers and blenders, based on the quality of the blends.

      2
      2
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Reverend Mike on April 6, 2025

    WOW!!! I read Rose’s well written article very closely and didn’t find it to glorify Crowley’s lifestyle, faith or writings at all. The article is not an opinion piece, just a biographical summary.

    The point of The Beast Small Batch is to spotlight this unorthodox tobacco blend, not Crowley. The nickname, The Beast, wasn’t given to Crowley as a compliment. His Mother gave him this nickname out of fear for his soul and to warn others what they could expect from their active association with Crowley. The fact that he wore it as a badge of honor just added to the many reasons why people should steer clear of this monstrous man.

    The unconventional tobacco blend of straight perique, soaked in rum, indicates just how skewed Crowley’s personal tastes were. He purportedly leaned into smoking the 100% perique to get the rush from what he thought were high psychoactive nicotine levels, also knowing the rum couldn’t hurt his quest.

    Jeremy Reeves blend simply draws inspiration from the unique blend Crowley made, not the man himself.

    I know my comments won’t change anyone else’s opinion here. Most of you folks are already convinced you’re right, regardless of the actual facts.

    3
    3
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Friendly Piper on April 6, 2025

      May not change minds, but definitely brings some reason and perspective.

      1
      3
      Reply
      Cancel
    • Jakob K. on April 8, 2025

      The fact is that the blend shares the nickname that, as you say, Crowley gleefully adopted. Should we embrace a new corncob pipe model called "The Grand Wizard" because a certain somebody enjoyed smoking corncob pipes? It's taking inspiration from the pipe, not the man, obviously, right?

      3
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Scott F. on April 6, 2025

    I’m over it. I get so tired of companies that ignorantly wade into controversial subjects because they are either too stupid to realize it, or simply don’t care one way or the other. Instead, they get everyone all riled up and insulting one another and their religious leanings then call it “good” for business. Well, my invoices with SmokingPipes totaled over $1500 for the first quarter of this year. Maybe that matters. Maybe it don’t. But piping for me is a peaceable and contemplative hobby. Certainly not this. And for a company to be a facilitator of this vitriolic diatribe is offensive to me. Enough for me to consider purchasing elsewhere.

    4
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Friendly Piper on April 6, 2025

    For what it’s worth, I don’t imagine the Laudisi team was trying to incite controversy and drama by rereleasing a blend (on April Fools Day, no less) with a long history of peaceful releases.

    The drama isn’t grass-roots, as evidenced by the no-drama past launches. It’s contrived controversy whipped up by an individual who revels in feigned outrages and grievances. Maybe he’ll quit the piping community for good this time or maybe we’ll see another online “suicidal gesture.” Either way, I hope he finds peace (and lets the rest of us have a little peace of our own).

    2
    5
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Scott F. on April 6, 2025

      I doubt few companies that become mired in controversy set out to do so intentionally (though some do). But I take issue with this being a “contrived” as evidenced by the number of dissident comments. It seems to me that this has offended more than one person. I run a family business that deals with the public and I can assure you, I know what will and will not offend my customers. You don’t piss off the people that pay the bills.

      6
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Friendly Piper on April 6, 2025

        First, I respect anyone who owns a family business. My father did and it was really difficult. Takes a lot of discipline and a tolerance for risk.

        I do think this was contrived, but you’re right that it’s it also includes people like you who legitimately disapprove of Laudisi’s actions. I think the first pebbles that became an avalanche of comments definitely were set in motion by a specific individual—but that isn’t to denigrate or dismiss those of you who saw the comments and shared your personal thoughts.

        Still feels to me like a tempest in a teapot, but those of you who are weighing in here without name-calling are people Laudisi should care about. You’re not looking for drama, you’re letting them know your thoughts.

        Appreciate your reply and wish your family business as much success as my father had (and hopefully less aggravation and stress than he had!).

        3
    • Greybeard on April 8, 2025

      I assume you're talking about Pipe Cottage. If so, he posted his video protesting this blend on March 31st. More than half the comments here were posted on the 30th before his video was released, so your theory is incorrect.

      As for past years: there were quite a few similar comments protesting this blend in last year release as well, myself included. I personally never heard of this blend until last year, even though it's apparently been released for a few years now. So again, it seems your theory about no drama in past launches is incorrect.

      3
      Reply
      Cancel
  • Friendly Piper on April 6, 2025

    First, I respect anyone who owns a family business. My father did and it was really difficult. Takes a lot of discipline and a tolerance for risk.

    I do think this was contrived, but you’re right that it’s it also includes people like you who legitimately disapprove of Laudisi’s actions. I think the first pebbles that became an avalanche of comments definitely were set in motion by a specific individual—but that isn’t to denigrate or dismiss those of you who saw the comments and shared your personal thoughts.

    Still feels to me like a tempest in a teapot, but those of you who are weighing in here without name-calling are people Laudisi should care about. You’re not looking for drama, you’re letting them know your thoughts.

    Appreciate your reply and wish your family business as much success as my father had (and hopefully less aggravation and stress than he had!).

    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Bearded Bard on April 6, 2025

    Wow! 🤯 I am surprised this article got any comments at all. I stopped reading after the first paragraph, shrugged, and moved on. My first thoughts were simply, “hmm… first job out of college; too long; off-topic and boring; she will improve.” Then I looked to see when my SP order was scheduled to arrive. No big deal. 🤷‍♂️

    2
    1
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • 🐫💣💥 on April 7, 2025

    So many people missing the mark (of the beast). Maybe they're new to the hobby or website. The Beast has been released before, Rose just drew the short straw COUGH to do the article, just following orders. And to do this release at this time of the year during Lent and the month that celebrates Easter is nothing new here. It's deliberate. Ha, ha, enjoy poking the bear... but the recent biased censorship is the straw that broke the camel's back for me, un-American. " For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter. " - George Washington
    Address to the Officers of the Army | Saturday, March 15, 1783

    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • John S. on April 8, 2025

    We should get to put names in for the next batch. You know, like a random submission type thing. Maybe it wouldn't create such a debacle.

    3
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Nosebleed on April 9, 2025

    The soy levels of most of these comments are astronomical. If blends like Father Dempsey and Presbyterian Mixture can exist, the Beast can too. Keep your Bible away from my tobacco.

    4
    Reply
    Cancel
    • Fiibonaci 1,1,2,3,5,8... on April 9, 2025

      @Nosebleed: I can agree that there is a high level of soy here and immaturity. Imagine that there is something that you hold sacred or near and dear, now imagine a business metaphorically pisses on it (Easter) and puts it on a platform signaling to the world that they are doing so. The timing of this release is doing just that. Yes, it has the American freedom to exist, as they censor their customers and former customers, but totally unprofessional. Halloween would have been a more appropriate time to release ONE OF THEIR SPOOKIEST BLENDS, but they're sending a message. Oh, yeah, God made that tobacco.

      5
      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Friendly Piper on April 9, 2025

        Not Easter. April Fool’s day.

        Sorry, you have to criticize what’s real. It seems like the name and article legitimately upset you—I’m not taking issue with that and believe you’re sincere in your unhappiness.

        But we shouldn’t exaggerate the facts to somehow provide evidence of an intentional insult where I don’t believe any was intended.

        It’s possible for people or companies to be insensitive without being malicious.

        1
        1
        4
      • Nosebleed on April 9, 2025

        I think your connection to the release window of the Beast and Easter is schizophrenic.

        1
        5
    • Laudate Dominum O. on April 10, 2025

      "You stupid Christian, evil things are exactly the same as good things and deserve equal treatment".

      You really should switch to pipe tobacco instead of marijuana.

      1
      1
      Reply
      Cancel
      • Fiibonaci 1,1,2,3,5,8... on April 10, 2025

        Mr. Praise the Lord, yes I interpreted your name, don't be a dumb ass. @Friendly Pjper: Everytime that this blend is released, DURING the month of Easter and Lent, there is a consistent reaction. Insensitivity done with intention=maliciousness. I use to love this website, but it has changed and the mask has dropped. It boggles the mind how people can be so dense, wilfully or blindly.

        2
        1
  • Jon DeCles on April 11, 2025

    I had the privilege of knowing Grady McMurtry, a direct inheritor of Crowley's Ordo Temploris, etc.. Grady was a kind man who worked to help others in many ways, including his occult practices. He was very knowledgeable in a number of fields. He also had some stories about Crowley that were very interesting to this writer.
    It was some years before I connected Crowley to pipe smoking, but then I was intrigued by the idea of pure Perique soaked in rum, so I got some pure Perique, soaked it in rum, and gave it a try.
    Grady had passed away many years before, but his widow remained a cherished family friend. One day when she was at our house I was smoking the mixture (I only ever made one batch) and she sniffed the air and said: "Yes, that's the stinky stuff that Grady liked. The mixture that Crowley taught him how to make."

    I ended up putting two and two together. Grady lived in Berkeley, and bought his tobacco at the store where the young Greg Pease worked.

    For me, Crowley was an interesting character. Not to be admired or despised, but..interesting. And it was fun to play a sensual version of 'six degrees of separation' and realize that I could, with some degree of certainly, smoke the same stuff he smoked. --Way too strong for me!

    But then, I also realized that I had known Grady, who knew Crowley. And some of Grady's stories even made their way into one of my books, if not in a flattering re-telling.

    Crowley's been dead a long time. He is an artifact of history, like the Inquisition. We have real life, alive now, people who are much more harmful on a much larger scale than he ever was.

    1
    2
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Erik on April 12, 2025

    I’ve been a loyal customer of Smokingpipes for years — I’ve appreciated the quality, the selection, and the overall sense of community this company has fostered. But after reading the recent blog post, “Aleister Crowley: The Beast That Inspired The Beast,” I can no longer remain silent.

    As an Orthodox Christian, I find it deeply troubling that Smokingpipes would choose to highlight, even in a seemingly neutral or historical way, a man who was openly anti-Christian, occultic, and proudly identified himself as “The Beast.” Crowley’s legacy is not misunderstood eccentricity — it’s a legacy of blasphemy, chaos, and spiritual darkness.

    Then, turning around and releasing a blend named “The Beast” alongside that post feels like a deliberate provocation. Whether it was intended that way or not, it crosses a line for those of us who take faith—and the meaning of words like good and evil—seriously.

    I know that my decision to stop supporting Smokingpipes probably won’t cause any financial waves. But I also know I’m not alone. Others who share my beliefs are taking note. And I pray more of us will vote with our wallets and redirect our support toward businesses that honor values rooted in truth, beauty, and moral clarity.

    I wish you all well, but I’ll be moving on.

    — A former loyal customer

    "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them." - St. Paul's letter to the Ephesians 5:11

    3
    1
    Reply
    Cancel
  • Friendly Piper on April 12, 2025

    Hey, I’m moving on from this thread but since it’s frequented by so many people who celebrate Easter, I wanted to wish you all a happy, healthy, and meaningful holiday.

    Reply
    Cancel
    • 😈 on April 15, 2025

      Not being insensitive or malicious. https://youtu.be/YaKvz6P2hV4?feature=shared

      1
      Reply
      Cancel

Join the conversation:


This will not be shared with anyone

challenge image
Enter the circled word below: